Literature DB >> 23070901

Interacting with objects compresses environmental representations in spatial memory.

Laura E Thomas1, Christopher C Davoli, James R Brockmole.   

Abstract

People perceive individual objects as being closer when they have the ability to interact with the objects than when they do not. We asked how interaction with multiple objects impacts representations of the environment. Participants studied multiple-object layouts, by manually exploring or simply observing each object, and then drew a scaled version of the environment (Exp. 1) or reconstructed a copy of the environment and its boundaries (Exp. 2) from memory. The participants who interacted with multiple objects remembered these objects as being closer together and reconstructed smaller environment boundaries than did the participants who looked without touching. These findings provide evidence that action-based perceptual distortions endure in memory over a moving observer's multiple interactions, compressing not only representations between touched objects, but also untouched environmental boundaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23070901     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0325-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception.

Authors:  M Bhalla; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Active and passive scene recognition across views.

Authors:  R F Wang; D J Simons
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

3.  Performance and ease influence perceived speed.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action.

Authors:  Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

5.  Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Jodie A Baird; Mark Greenburg; Robert Russell; Kevin Shaughnessy; Scott Waymouth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

6.  Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; James R Brockmole; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance.

Authors:  Emily K Bloesch; Christopher C Davoli; Noam Roth; James R Brockmole; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

8.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt; William Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The long road of pain: chronic pain increases perceived distance.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Sally A Linkenauger; Jonathan Z Bakdash; Jason S Augustyn; Andrew Cook; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Kicking to bigger uprights: field goal kicking performance influences perceived size.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Travis E Dorsch
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  4 in total

1.  Priorities for representation: Task settings and object interaction both influence object memory.

Authors:  Clare Kirtley; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

2.  Grasp posture alters visual processing biases near the hands.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-10

3.  My shadow, myself: cast-body shadows are embodied.

Authors:  Christopher Kuylen; Benjamin Balas; Laura E Thomas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

4.  Grasp posture modulates attentional prioritization of space near the hands.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.