Literature DB >> 22231725

Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance.

Emily K Bloesch1, Christopher C Davoli, Noam Roth, James R Brockmole, Richard A Abrams.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that being able to interact with an object causes it to be perceived as being closer than objects that cannot be interacted with. In the present study, we examined whether that compression of perceived space would be experienced by people who simply observed such interactions by others with no intention of performing the action themselves. Participants judged the distance to targets after observing an actor reach to an otherwise unreachable target with a tool (Experiment 1) or illuminate a distant target with a laser pointer (Experiment 2). Observing either type of interaction caused a compression of perceived space, revealing that a person's perception of space can be altered through mere observation. These results indicate that shared representations between an actor and observer are engaged at the perceptual level easily and perhaps automatically, even in the absence of cooperation or an observer's own intention to interact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22231725     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0200-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention.

Authors:  S R Langton; V Bruce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  The mirror neuron system and action recognition.

Authors:  Giovanni Buccino; Ferdinand Binkofski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?

Authors:  Marcel Brass; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; James R Brockmole; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.

Authors:  Dana Samson; Ian A Apperly; Jason J Braithwaite; Benjamin J Andrews; Sarah E Bodley Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates.

Authors:  A N Meltzoff; M K Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  fMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Trevor T-J Chong; Ross Cunnington; Mark A Williams; Nancy Kanwisher; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Coordinating cognition: the costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search.

Authors:  Susan E Brennan; Xin Chen; Christopher A Dickinson; Mark B Neider; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-06

10.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own?

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07
View more
  16 in total

1.  Catching ease influences perceived speed: evidence for action-specific effects from action-based measures.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the inferior frontal cortex affects the "social scaling" of extrapersonal space depending on perspective-taking ability.

Authors:  Chiara Fini; Lara Bardi; Alessandra Epifanio; Giorgia Committeri; Agnes Moors; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial representations in older adults are not modified by action: Evidence from tool use.

Authors:  Matthew C Costello; Emily K Bloesch; Christopher C Davoli; Nicholas D Panting; Richard A Abrams; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-08

5.  Interacting with objects compresses environmental representations in spatial memory.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Christopher C Davoli; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  When a laser pen becomes a stick: remapping of space by tool-use observation in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Francesca Frassinetti; Manuela Maini; Ettore Ambrosini; Vittorio Gallese; Corrado Sinigaglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Action-specific influences on perception and postperceptual processes: Present controversies and future directions.

Authors:  John W Philbeck; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  A perceiver's own abilities influence perception, even when observing others.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Susan C South; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

9.  How watching Pinocchio movies changes our subjective experience of extrapersonal space.

Authors:  Chiara Fini; Giorgia Committeri; Barbara C N Müller; Eliane Deschrijver; Marcel Brass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Joint attention for stimuli on the hands: ownership matters.

Authors:  J E T Taylor; Jay Pratt; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.