Literature DB >> 11703046

Comparison of measurement accuracy between two types of wrist goniometer systems.

P Jonsson1, P W Johnson.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that wrist goniometers are prone to measurement errors, particularly due to crosstalk. This study compared two wrist goniometer systems: a commonly used biaxial, single transducer (System A) and a biaxial, two-transducer (System B). Wrist angles, range of movement and crosstalk results were compared. With the wrist in 90 degrees of pronation, eight subjects were placed in 20 different wrist postures between -40 degrees and 40 degrees of flexion/extension and between -10 degrees and 20 degrees of deviation. Relative to System B, System A had larger measurement errors and was more prone to crosstalk. There may be two sources of crosstalk: (1) intrinsic crosstalk associated with the design, application and twisting of the goniometer transducer when on the wrist, and (2) extrinsic crosstalk associated with the anatomy and complex movement of the wrist joint. It appears that the majority of the radial/ulnar crosstalk measured with System A was intrinsic crosstalk due to the twisting of the goniometer transducer.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11703046     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(01)00036-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Position-sensing technologies for movement analysis in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  H Zheng; N D Black; N D Harris
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A hand speed-duty cycle equation for estimating the ACGIH hand activity level rating.

Authors:  Oguz Akkas; David P Azari; Chia-Hsiung Eric Chen; Yu Hen Hu; Sheryl S Ulin; Thomas J Armstrong; David Rempel; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Developing a framework for predicting upper extremity muscle activities, postures, velocities, and accelerations during computer use: the effect of keyboard use, mouse use, and individual factors on physical exposures.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bruno Garza; Paul J Catalano; Jeffrey N Katz; Maaike A Huysmans; Jack T Dennerlein
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Automated video exposure assessment of repetitive hand activity level for a load transfer task.

Authors:  Chia-Hsiung Chen; Yu Hen Hu; Thomas Y Yen; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Reliability and Validity of Electro-Goniometric Range of Motion Measurements in Patients with Hand and Wrist Limitations.

Authors:  Siamak Bashardoust Tajali; Joy C MacDermid; Ruby Grewal; Chris Young
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-06-15

6.  Evaluation of a New Simplified Inertial Sensor Method against Electrogoniometer for Measuring Wrist Motion in Occupational Studies.

Authors:  Karnica Manivasagam; Liyun Yang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  A Non-Contact Measurement System for the Range of Motion of the Hand.

Authors:  Trieu Pham; Pubudu N Pathirana; Hieu Trinh; Pearse Fay
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Comparison of the Performance of the Leap Motion ControllerTM with a Standard Marker-Based Motion Capture System.

Authors:  Amartya Ganguly; Gabriel Rashidi; Katja Mombaur
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.