PURPOSE: Attempts to understand the causes of cognitive impairment in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are complicated by the overlap among clinical and demographic factors that may impact cognition. The goal of the current study was to isolate the contribution of hypoxemia to cognitive impairment in OSA. METHODS: Two groups of 20 patients with newly diagnosed OSA were compared. The groups differed on severity of hypoxemia but not other demographic (e.g., age, gender, education, estimated premorbid IQ) or clinical (e.g., sleep related respiratory disturbances, daytime sleepiness, depressive symptoms) variables. Participants completed polysonmography and cognitive assessment. RESULTS: We compared patients with high and low hypoxemia on measures of memory, attention, executive functioning, and motor coordination using independent sample t-tests. The high hypoxemia group performed significantly better on immediate recall (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised; t = -2.50, p < 0.02) than the low hypoxemia group. No group differences were observed on other neuropsychological measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to compare the cognitive performance of patients with high and low hypoxemia after controlling for demographic factors and aspects of OSA severity that could confound the relationship. In our carefully matched sample, we observed an unexpected advantage of higher hypoxemia on memory. These preliminary findings are discussed in the context of basic science literature on the protective effects of adaptation to intermittent hypoxemia. Our data suggest that the association between hypoxemia and cognition may not straightforward. Future research targeting the effects of hypoxemia on cognition controlling for other clinical factors in large groups of patients with OSA will be important.
PURPOSE: Attempts to understand the causes of cognitive impairment in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are complicated by the overlap among clinical and demographic factors that may impact cognition. The goal of the current study was to isolate the contribution of hypoxemia to cognitive impairment in OSA. METHODS: Two groups of 20 patients with newly diagnosed OSA were compared. The groups differed on severity of hypoxemia but not other demographic (e.g., age, gender, education, estimated premorbid IQ) or clinical (e.g., sleep related respiratory disturbances, daytime sleepiness, depressive symptoms) variables. Participants completed polysonmography and cognitive assessment. RESULTS: We compared patients with high and low hypoxemia on measures of memory, attention, executive functioning, and motor coordination using independent sample t-tests. The high hypoxemia group performed significantly better on immediate recall (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised; t = -2.50, p < 0.02) than the low hypoxemia group. No group differences were observed on other neuropsychological measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to compare the cognitive performance of patients with high and low hypoxemia after controlling for demographic factors and aspects of OSA severity that could confound the relationship. In our carefully matched sample, we observed an unexpected advantage of higher hypoxemia on memory. These preliminary findings are discussed in the context of basic science literature on the protective effects of adaptation to intermittent hypoxemia. Our data suggest that the association between hypoxemia and cognition may not straightforward. Future research targeting the effects of hypoxemia on cognition controlling for other clinical factors in large groups of patients with OSA will be important.
Authors: Stuart F Quan; Cynthia S Chan; William C Dement; Alan Gevins; James L Goodwin; Daniel J Gottlieb; Sylvan Green; Christian Guilleminault; Max Hirshkowitz; Pamela R Hyde; Gary G Kay; Eileen B Leary; Deborah A Nichols; Paula K Schweitzer; Richard D Simon; James K Walsh; Clete A Kushida Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Isaac Almendros; Ramon Farré; Anna M Planas; Marta Torres; Maria R Bonsignore; Daniel Navajas; Josep M Montserrat Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Nadezhda P Lyamina; Svetlana V Lyamina; Valery N Senchiknin; Robert T Mallet; H Fred Downey; Eugenia B Manukhina Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Gillian L Twigg; Ioannis Papaioannou; Melinda Jackson; Ramesh Ghiassi; Zarrin Shaikh; Jay Jaye; Kim S Graham; Anita K Simonds; Mary J Morrell Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Paul M Macey; Janani P Prasad; Jennifer A Ogren; Ammar S Moiyadi; Ravi S Aysola; Rajesh Kumar; Frisca L Yan-Go; Mary A Woo; M Albert Thomas; Ronald M Harper Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 4.881