Literature DB >> 23065538

Effects of alternative outcome scenarios and structured outcome evaluation on case-based ethics instruction.

Juandre Peacock1, Lauren N Harkrider, Zhanna Bagdasarov, Shane Connelly, James F Johnson, Chase E Thiel, Alexandra E Macdougall, Michael D Mumford, Lynn D Devenport.   

Abstract

Case-based instruction has been regarded by many as a viable alternative to traditional lecture-based education and training. However, little is known about how case-based training techniques impact training effectiveness. This study examined the effects of two such techniques: (a) presentation of alternative outcome scenarios to a case, and (b) conducting a structured outcome evaluation. Consistent with the hypotheses, results indicate that presentation of alternative outcome scenarios reduced knowledge acquisition, reduced sensemaking and ethical decision-making strategy use, and reduced decision ethicality. Conducting a structured outcome evaluation had no impact on these outcomes. Results indicate that those who use case-based instruction should take care to use clear, less complex cases with only a singular outcome if they are seeking these types of outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065538     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9402-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

1.  Case-based knowledge and ethics education: improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases.

Authors:  Chase E Thiel; Shane Connelly; Lauren Harkrider; Lynn D Devenport; Zhanna Bagdasarov; James F Johnson; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Mental models: an alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction.

Authors:  Meagan E Brock; Andrew Vert; Vykinta Kligyte; Ethan P Waples; Sydney T Sevier; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning.

Authors:  J L Kolodner
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-01

4.  Case-based ethics education: the impact of cause complexity and outcome favorability on ethicality.

Authors:  James F Johnson; Zhanna Bagdasarov; Shane Connelly; Lauren Harkrider; Lynn D Devenport; Michael D Mumford; Chase E Thiel
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Strategies in Forecasting Outcomes in Ethical Decision-making: Identifying and Analyzing the Causes of the Problem.

Authors:  Cheryl K Beeler; Alison L Antes; Xiaoqian Wang; Jared J Caughron; Chase E Thiel; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2010-03-19

6.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Ryan P Brown; Stephen T Murphy; Jason H Hill; Alison L Antes; Ethan P Waples; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2008-10-01
  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Continuous Evaluation in Ethics Education: A Case Study.

Authors:  Tristan McIntosh; Cory Higgs; Michael Mumford; Shane Connelly; James DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The capacity for ethical decisions: the relationship between working memory and ethical decision making.

Authors:  April Martin; Zhanna Bagdasarov; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.