Literature DB >> 23065170

The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging.

Susan J Freeman1, Ahmed M Aly, Masako Y Kataoka, Helen C Addley, Caroline Reinhold, Evis Sala.   

Abstract

Cancers of the uterine corpus and cervix are the most common gynecologic malignancies worldwide. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was first established in 1958, when it was recognized that the recurrence rate and patient outcomes were directly related to the degree of tumor spread at the patient's initial presentation. Changes in understanding of tumor biology led to a recent update in the FIGO staging system that reflects the variation in treatment strategies between endometrial and cervical cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer are primarily treated with hysterectomy; thus, staging is done at surgery and histologic analysis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may accurately depict the extent of endometrial cancer at diagnosis and, in conjunction with the tumor grade and histologic subtype, help stratify risk, which determines the therapeutic course. Cervical carcinoma is staged at clinical examination because many tumors are inoperable at the time of patient presentation. Preoperative MR imaging criteria are not formally included in the revised FIGO staging system because cervical carcinoma is most prevalent in developing countries, where imaging resources are limited. However, MR imaging is highly sensitive and specific for depicting important prognostic factors and, when available, is recommended as an adjunct to clinical examination. The MR imaging findings of uterine carcinoma should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting in conjunction with clinical and histologic findings, an approach that provides accurate staging and risk stratification and allows for individualized treatment. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065170     DOI: 10.1148/rg.326125519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  42 in total

1.  Endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Gigin Lin; Yu-Ting Huang; Angel Chao; Yu-Chun Lin; Lan-Yan Yang; Ren-Chin Wu; Hsin-Ying Lu; Shu-Hang Ng; Koon-Kwan Ng; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Charis Bourgioti; Konstantinos Chatoupis; Lia Angela Moulopoulos
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

3.  MRI Evaluation of Local Extent of Carcinoma Cervix - Is Post Contrast Imaging Needed in Every Case?

Authors:  Joish Upendra Kumar; Ramireddy Harikiran Reddy; Pallavi Sinha; Niveditha Kodali; Vivek Sreekanth
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Integrated PET/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Johannes Grueneisen; Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Martin Heubner; Bahriye Aktas; Sonja Kinner; Michael Forsting; Thomas Lauenstein; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  MR imaging features and staging of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix with pathological correlations.

Authors:  Xiaohui Duan; Xiaohua Ban; Xiang Zhang; Huijun Hu; Guozhao Li; Dongye Wang; Charles Qian Wang; Fang Zhang; Jun Shen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of endometrial cancer: optimizing the imaging delay for tumour-myometrium contrast.

Authors:  Sung Bin Park; Min Hoan Moon; Chang Kyu Sung; Sohee Oh; Young Ho Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Optimization of MR imaging for pretreatment evaluation of patients with endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Gaiane M Rauch; Harmeet Kaur; Haesun Choi; Randy D Ernst; Ann H Klopp; Piyaporn Boonsirikamchai; Shannon N Westin; Leonardo P Marcal
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Diffusion weighted imaging in gynecological malignancies - present and future.

Authors:  Dinesh Manoharan; Chandan J Das; Ankita Aggarwal; Arun K Gupta
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28

9.  Endometrial cancer: diagnostic value of quantitative measurements of microvascular changes with DCE-MR imaging.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Orazio Minutolo; Anna Cadonici; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Pietro Bonaffini; Patrizia Perego; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  Metastatic gynecologic malignancies: advances in treatment and management.

Authors:  John K Chan; Stephanie Chow; Subasish Bhowmik; Amandeep Mann; Daniel S Kapp; Robert L Coleman
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.