Literature DB >> 23064878

Selection of proximal fusion level for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Kyu-Jung Cho1, Se-Il Suk, Seung-Rim Park, Jin-Hyok Kim, Jae-Hoon Jung.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is controversy regarding the appropriate proximal fusion level for adult degenerative scoliosis. Ideally, the horizontal vertebra is chosen for the upper instrumented vertebra to create a balanced spine. Fusion to T10 is recommended to prevent junctional problems at the proximal adjacent segment. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the optimal proximal fusion level for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis (mean age 64.6 years) who underwent posterior instrumentation were analyzed after a minimum 2-year follow-up. The average number of levels fused was 5.9 segments (range 3-9) with distal fusion at L5 in 30 patients and S1 in 21 patients. The upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) ranged from T9 to L2. According to the relationship between UIV, horizontal vertebra (HV) and upper end vertebra (UEV), the patients were divided into three groups in the coronal plane: Group HV (UIV = HV or above); Group HV-UEV (UIV = between HV and UEV); and Group UEV (UIV = UEV or below). In the sagittal plane; the patients were divided into Group T9-10 (UIV = T9-10), Group T11-12 and Group L1-2.
RESULTS: Proximal adjacent segment disease (ASD) was identified in 13 (25 %) out of 51 patients, including junctional kyphosis (n = 5), compression fractures (n = 4), progression of disc wedging (n = 2) and spinal stenosis (n = 2). Group UEV had more ASD (9 of 16 patients) compared to Group HV (2 of 21 patients) and Group HV-UEV (2 of 14 patients). It appeared that neutral vertebra could be a criterion for the selection of UIV in the coronal plane. Among the groups divided in the sagittal plane, proximal ASD was found in 47 % of 19 patients in Group L1-2, which was notably higher than 9 % in Group T9-10 and 20 % in Group T11-12.
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal adjacent segment disease developed more commonly when the proximal fusion stopped at the UEV or below in adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. UIV must be above UEV in the coronal plane. Fusion to T11 or T12 was acceptable when UIV was above UEV, since there was no significant difference in the rate of proximal adjacent segment between fusion to T10 and fusion to T11 or T12.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23064878      PMCID: PMC3555634          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2527-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  G A Lee; R R Betz; D H Clements; G K Huss
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Pelvic parameters: origin and significance.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Aunoble; Leijssen Philippe; Pellet Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Debate: determining the upper instrumented vertebra in the management of adult degenerative scoliosis: stopping at T10 versus L1.

Authors:  Harry Shufflebarger; Se-Il Suk; Steven Mardjetko
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Surgical strategies and choosing levels for spinal deformity: how high, how low, front and back.

Authors:  James M Mok; Serena S Hu
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Surgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with associated scoliosis.

Authors:  E D Simmons
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis.

Authors:  R Chris Glattes; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Anthony Rinella; Charles Edwards
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Kyu-Jung Cho; Se-Il Suk; Seung-Rim Park; Jin-Hyok Kim; Sung-Soo Kim; Won-Kee Choi; Kang-Yoon Lee; Seung-Ryol Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Degenerative scoliosis. Options for surgical management.

Authors:  Munish C Gupta
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis.

Authors:  S A Grubb; H J Lipscomb; P B Suh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  22 in total

1.  Surgical treatments for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Wang; Jianzhong Hu; Xiangyang Liu; Yong Cao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Limited long-segment fusion for degenerative lower lumbar scoliosis: a special kind of scoliosis.

Authors:  Jianwei Du; Xiangyu Tang; Ningdao Li; Lin Zhang; Xifeng Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis after internal fixation for adult spinal deformity: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Kai Chen; Xiao Zhai; Kai Chen; Ming Li; Yanghu Lu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Thoracolumbar junction orientation: its impact on thoracic kyphosis and sagittal alignment in both asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Hong Joo Moon; Keith H Bridwell; Alekos A Theologis; Micheal P Kelly; Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit; Han Jo Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Munish C Gupta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Selection of proximal fusion level for degenerative scoliosis and the entailing proximal-related late complications.

Authors:  Yi Zhu; Kaifeng Wang; Bo Wang; Huimin Wang; Zhaohui Jin; Zhenqi Zhu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

6.  Effect of sagittal shape on proximal junctional kyphosis following thoracopelvic corrective fusion for adult spinal deformity: postoperative inflection vertebra cranial to T12 is a significant risk factor.

Authors:  Sreenath Jakinapally; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Daisuke Togawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Shin Oe; Tatsuya Yasuda; Hiroki Ushirozako; Tomohiro Yamada; Koichirou Ide; Yuh Watanabe; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-06-23

7.  Risk factors of proximal junctional angle increase after selective posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Zhijian Sun; Guixing Qiu; Yu Zhao; Shigong Guo; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Kyu-Jung Cho; Young-Tae Kim; Sang-Hyun Shin; Se-Il Suk
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09

Review 9.  [Surgical treatment of de-novo scoliosis].

Authors:  M Putzier; M Pumberger; H Halm; R K Zahn; J Franke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Preservation of Spine Motion in the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using an Innovative Apical Fusion Technique: A 2-Year Follow-Up Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pooria Hosseini; Allen Carl; Michael Grevitt; Colin Nnadi; Martin Repko; Dennis G Crandall; Ufuk Aydinli; Ľuboš Rehák; Martin Zabka; Steven Seme; Behrooz A Akbarnia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.