Literature DB >> 32578158

Effect of sagittal shape on proximal junctional kyphosis following thoracopelvic corrective fusion for adult spinal deformity: postoperative inflection vertebra cranial to T12 is a significant risk factor.

Sreenath Jakinapally1, Yu Yamato2,3, Tomohiko Hasegawa1, Daisuke Togawa4, Go Yoshida1, Tomohiro Banno1, Hideyuki Arima1, Shin Oe1,5, Tatsuya Yasuda1, Hiroki Ushirozako1, Tomohiro Yamada1, Koichirou Ide1, Yuh Watanabe1, Yukihiro Matsuyama1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected consecutive case series of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of the geometrical sagittal shape of the corrected spine on the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Several studies have documented risk factors for PJK in ASD surgery. Geometrical assessment is vital for evaluating sagittal spinal deformity. It is essential to assess the postoperative geometrical shape of the spine and the location of the correction in the spine to decrease postoperative junctional stress and PJK.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with ASD who underwent corrective fusion with long constructs to the pelvis were included. Patients with neuromuscular disease, congenital and adolescent scoliosis, infection, and spinal tumor were excluded. We investigated the spinopelvic and geometrical parameters of the whole spine. The locations of the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae and the inflection vertebrae (IV), where the curvature of the associated adjacent vertebral bodies changes from kyphosis to lordosis, were investigated. The subjects were divided into PJK included patients who underwent revision surgery for junctional failure or with a change in proximal junctional angle ≥ 20°, and non-PJK groups.
RESULTS: A total of 139 patients (mean age, 69.6 years; range 18-82 years) were included. There were 47 and 92 patients in the PJK and non-PJK groups, respectively. The IV were located significantly cranial and posterior, the lumbar apex were located significantly posterior in the PJK group at the immediate postoperative time points. The significant risk factors for PJK on binary logistic regression were cranial IV and posterior lumbar apical vertebrae. The incidence of PJK in patients with IV at T12 or cranial tends PJK significantly higher (69%) than at L1 or caudal (26%).
CONCLUSIONS: Geometrical spinal shape should be taken into account to reduce the rate of postoperative mechanical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Corrective fusion surgery; Mechanical complication; Proximal junctional kyphosis; Spinal geometry

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32578158     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00162-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  14 in total

1.  Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Pierre Roussouly; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Gennaro D'Acunzi; Gilles Perrin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Jérôme Jund; Olivier Noseda; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Radiographical and Implant-Related Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Incidence, Patient Risk Factors, and Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Alexandra Soroceanu; Bassel G Diebo; Douglas Burton; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Gregory Mundis; Christopher Ames; Thomas Errico; Shay Bess; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; João Luiz Pinheiro-Franco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Differences in the geometrical spinal shape in the sagittal plane according to age and magnitude of pelvic incidence in healthy elderly individuals.

Authors:  Yu Yamato; Yoshihiro Sato; Daisuke Togawa; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Shin Oe; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Tomohiro Yamada; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Selection of proximal fusion level for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Kyu-Jung Cho; Se-Il Suk; Seung-Rim Park; Jin-Hyok Kim; Jae-Hoon Jung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Incidence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng-Yu Liu; Tao Wang; Si-Dong Yang; Hui Wang; Da-Long Yang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in primary adult deformity surgery: evaluation of 20 degrees as a critical angle.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Samuel K Cho; Joshua M Pahys; Lukas P Zebala; Ian G Dorward; Woojin Cho; Christine Baldus; Brian W Hill; Matthew M Kang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions.

Authors:  Ferran Pellisé; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Montse Ferrer; Montse Domingo-Sàbat; Juan Bagó; Francisco J S Pérez-Grueso; Ahmet Alanay; A F Mannion; Emre Acaroglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction.

Authors:  M Bernhardt; K H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Compensatory mechanisms recruited against proximal junctional kyphosis by patients instrumented from the thoracolumbar junction to the iliac.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Francisco Javier Sánchez Perez-Grueso; Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro; Fernando Escámez; Caglar Yilgor; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Nicomedes Fernández-Baíllo; José Miguel Sánchez-Márquez; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Ahmet Alanay; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The validation study of preoperative surgical planning for corrective target in adult spinal deformity surgery with 5-year follow-up for mechanical complications.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Koichiro Ide; Tomohiro Yamada; Kenta Kurosu; Keiichi Nakai; Takeuchi Yuki; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-16       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  The odontoid-CSVL distance in a global population of asymptomatic volunteers: normative values and implications for spinal coronal alignment.

Authors:  Scott L Zuckerman; Zeeshan M Sardar; Christopher S Lai; Gerard F Marciano; Mena G Kerolus; Ian A Buchanan; Alex S Ha; Meghan Cerpa; Michael P Kelly; Stéphane Bourret; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Hee-Kit Wong; Gabriel Liu; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Hend Riahi; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Relook into the Risk Factors of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Early Onset Scoliosis Patients: Does the Location of Upper Instrumented Vertebra in Relation to the Sagittal Apex Matter?

Authors:  Bo Yang; Liang Xu; Qingshuang Zhou; Zhuang Qian; Bin Wang; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Xu Sun
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.