Literature DB >> 27514825

[Surgical treatment of de-novo scoliosis].

M Putzier1, M Pumberger2, H Halm3, R K Zahn2, J Franke4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: De-novo scoliosis is most commonly associated with chronic back pain and in 70 % of cases with neurological symptoms of the lower extremities. In recent literature, the occurrence and severity of segmental lateral listhesis has been discussed as being an important prognostic factor of sagittal and frontal deformity progression. In general, operative interventions in patients with de-novo scoliosis are associated with a high rate of complications. Therefore, conservative treatment modalities are recommended at early stages of the disease. If conservative management fails and a sufficient reduction of the patient's symptoms cannot be achieved, depending on the symptoms, a selective decompression, short-segment fusion or long-instrumented reduction and fusion are indicated. Additionally to the patient's symptoms, specific imaging diagnostics are necessary to develop an adequate surgical treatment strategy. TREATMENT: Selective decompression without fusion is indicated in patients with a fixed deformity and primarily neurologic pain or deficits. In conditions of a focal pathology as cause of significant low back pain and/or neurologic symptoms at early stages of deformity, a short segment fusion is the treatment of choice. However, short-segment fusion as a less-invasive procedure must not be performed in biplanar unbalanced patients and/or advanced de-novo scoliosis. In advanced degenerative de-novo scoliosis a long-segment reposition and fusion following an alignment correction are needed. Standardized pre-operative planning and perioperative management are highly critical to the post-operative success.
CONCLUSION: All operative treatment strategies in patients with de-novo scoliosis can be successful but they require sophisticated and individual surgical indication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back ache; Deformities; Pseudarthrosis; Sagittal Balance; Spondylodesis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27514825     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3313-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  59 in total

1.  Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Failure of lumbopelvic fixation after long construct fusions in patients with adult spinal deformity: clinical and radiographic risk factors: clinical article.

Authors:  Woojin Cho; Jonathan R Mason; Justin S Smith; Adam L Shimer; Adam S Wilson; Christopher I Shaffrey; Francis H Shen; Wendy M Novicoff; Kai-Ming G Fu; Joshua E Heller; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-08-02

4.  Sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters after lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative scoliosis: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Mark B Dekutoski; Quanqi Cui; Arjun S Sebastian; Bryan M Armitage; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Moon Soo Park; Kwang Sup Song; Chaiwat Piyaskulkaew; Tapanut Chuntarapas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A mid-term follow-up result of spinopelvic fixation using iliac screws for lumbosacral fusion.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung-Chul Rhim; Yongjung J Kim; Young-Bae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

7.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Selection of fusion levels in adults with spinal deformity: an update.

Authors:  Benjamin Blondel; Amy M Wickman; Alexios Apazidis; Virginie C Lafage; Frank J Schwab; John A Bendo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5: fate of the L5-S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Craig A Kuhns; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Courtney Amor; Ronald A Lehman; Jacob M Buchowski; Charles Edwards; Baldus Christine
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Analytical comparison study of the clinical and radiological outcome of spine fixation using posterolateral, posterior lumber interbody and transforaminal lumber interbody spinal fixation techniques to treat lumber spine degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Moh'd M Al Barbarawi; Ziad M Audat; Mohammed Z Allouh
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-05-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison between Dynamic Stabilization and Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Lei Luo; Liehua Liu; Pei Li; Chen Zhao; Lichuan Liang; Fei Luo; Qiang Zhou; Yanhong Chen; Lang Fang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.667

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.