Literature DB >> 23063228

In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files.

Ricardo Castelló-Escrivá1, Teresa Alegre-Domingo, Vicente Faus-Matoses, Sophie Román-Richon, Vicente J Faus-Llácer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic instruments from ProTaper, WaveOne (WO), and Twisted Files (TF).
METHODS: Cyclic fatigue testing was conducted by operating instruments from ProTaper F2, WO 25 .08, and TF 25 .08. A total of 184 instruments were rotated in 4 curved artificial canals with different angles and radius of curvature. The time and cycles to failure were calculated. The data were compared for differences by using 2-way analysis of variance (P < .05).
RESULTS: In general, WO was the most resistant to fatigue failure of the tested instruments, and TF showed a higher number of cycles to failure than ProTaper.
CONCLUSIONS: Reciprocating movement of WO showed a longer cyclic fatigue life than conventional rotary movement of TF and ProTaper. The new manufacturing twisting process of TF produced NiTi rotary instruments more resistant to fatigue than ProTaper instruments produced with the traditional NiTi grinding process.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23063228     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  9 in total

1.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe, ProTaper, and Mtwo nickel-titanium retreatment instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite.

Authors:  Hüseyin Sinan Topçuoğlu; Kanşad Pala; Ahmet Aktı; Salih Düzgün; Gamze Topçuoğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments.

Authors:  Cangül Keskin; Uğur İnan; Murat Demiral; Ali Keleş
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Incidence of Deformation and Fracture of Twisted File Adaptive Instruments after Repeated Clinical Use.

Authors:  Gianluca Gambarini; Lucila Piasecki; Dario Di Nardo; Gabriele Miccoli; Gianni Di Giorgio; Everdan Carneiro; Dina Al-Sudani; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-12-28

4.  Cervical Dentin Changes in Curved Root Canals after Using WaveOne and Reciproc Files with Full Rotation versus Reciprocation Movement: An Ex vivo Study.

Authors:  Yazdan Shantiaee; Golnaz Nahvi; Omid Dianat; Farzad Aghdashi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Evaluation of usage-induced degradation of different endodontic file systems.

Authors:  Shekhar Bhatia; Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu; Ove A Peters; Amr Fawzy; Umer Daood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  An in vitro cyclic fatigue resistance comparison of conventional and new generation nickel-titanium rotary files.

Authors:  Celia Ruiz-Sánchez; Vicente Faus-Matoses; Teresa Alegre-Domingo; Ignacio Faus-Matoses; Vicente-José Faus-Llácer
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-08-01

7.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, Reciproc, and WaveOne: An in vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Alberto Dagna; Claudio Poggio; Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Colombo; Marco Chiesa; Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-05

8.  Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Manufacturing Process on Distortion of Rotary ProFile and Twisted File: An in Vitro SEM Study.

Authors:  Swati Sharma; Rajendra Kumar Tewari; Pankaj Kharade; Pankaj Kharade
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-12-30

Review 9.  Present status and future directions: Canal shaping.

Authors:  Ana Arias; Ove A Peters
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.165

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.