Literature DB >> 23060256

Evaluation of the RF heating of a generic deep brain stimulator exposed in 1.5 T magnetic resonance scanners.

Eugenia Cabot1, Tom Lloyd, Andreas Christ, Wolfgang Kainz, Mark Douglas, Gregg Stenzel, Steve Wedan, Niels Kuster.   

Abstract

The radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic field of magnetic resonance (MR) scanners can result in significant tissue heating due to the RF coupling with the conducting parts of medical implants. The objective of this article is to evaluate the advantages and shortcomings of a new four-tier approach based on a combined numerical and experimental procedure, designed to demonstrate safety of implants during MR scans. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first study analyzing this technique. The evaluation is performed for 1.5 T MR scanners using a generic model of a deep brain stimulator (DBS) with a straight lead and a helical lead. The results show that the approach is technically feasible and provides sound and conservative information about the potential heating of implants. We demonstrate that (1) applying optimized tools results in reasonable uncertainties for the overall evaluation; (2) each tier reduces the overestimation by several dB at the cost of more demanding evaluation steps; (3) the implant with the straight lead would cause local temperature increases larger than 18 °C at the RF exposure limit for the normal operating mode; (4) Tier 3 is not sufficient for the helical implant; and (5) Tier 4 might be too demanding to be performed for complex implants. We conclude with a suggestion for a procedure that follows the same concept but is between Tier 3 and 4. In addition, the evaluation of Tier 3 has shown consistency with current scan practice, namely, the resulting heat at the lead tip is less than 3.5 °C for the straight lead and 0.7 °C for the helix lead for scans at the current applied MR scan restrictions for deep brain stimulation at a head average SAR of 0.1 W/kg.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23060256     DOI: 10.1002/bem.21745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  24 in total

1.  Assessing the Electromagnetic Fields Generated By a Radiofrequency MRI Body Coil at 64 MHz: Defeaturing Versus Accuracy.

Authors:  Elena Lucano; Micaela Liberti; Gonzalo G Mendoza; Tom Lloyd; Maria Ida Iacono; Francesca Apollonio; Steve Wedan; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  The 'virtual DBS population': five realistic computational models of deep brain stimulation patients for electromagnetic MR safety studies.

Authors:  Bastien Guerin; Maria Ida Iacono; Mathias Davids; Darin Dougherty; Leonardo M Angelone; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Role of radiology in central nervous system stimulation.

Authors:  D P Minks; E A C Pereira; V E L Young; K M Hogarth; G Quaghebeur
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  [MR safety assessment of active implanted medical devices. German version].

Authors:  Sarra Aissani; Elmar Laistler; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  MR safety assessment of active implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Sarra Aissani; Elmar Laistler; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Construction and modeling of a reconfigurable MRI coil for lowering SAR in patients with deep brain stimulation implants.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Maria Ida Iacono; Boris Keil; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar; Michael D Fox; Todd Herrington; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Cristen LaPierre; Azma Mareyam; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A numerical investigation on the effect of RF coil feed variability on global and local electromagnetic field exposure in human body models at 64 MHz.

Authors:  Elena Lucano; Micaela Liberti; Tom Lloyd; Francesca Apollonio; Steve Wedan; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: A simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; Maria Ida Iacono; Husam Katnani; Lawrence L Wald; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Reducing RF-induced Heating near Implanted Leads through High-Dielectric Capacitive Bleeding of Current (CBLOC).

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; John Kirsch; Sean Downs; Boris Keil; Giorgio Bonmassar; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  MRI in patients with implanted active devices: how to combine safety and image quality using a limited transmission field?

Authors:  Laura Lunden; Stephan Wolff; Sönke Peters; Catharina Drews; Christine Gierloff; Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Patrick Langguth; Jawid Madjidyar; Tim-Christian Piesch; Olav Jansen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.