Literature DB >> 7981538

Risk factors influencing the short-term results of gastroduodenal perforation.

T Wakayama1, Y Ishizaki, M Mitsusada, S Takahashi, T Wada, Y Fukushima, H Hattori, T Okuyama, H Funatsu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors influencing the short-term results of gastroduodenal perforation to determine the optimal treatment for reducing mortality. A total of 136 patients were retrospectively reviewed and the prognostic factors were examined. Seven patients died within 30 days, with an overall mortality rate of 5.1%. Mortality was significantly worse in those aged 50 years or more, when the leukocyte count was less than 9,500/mm3, when treatment was delayed more than 12h after perforation, in cases of preoperative shock and renal failure, and when associated with liver cirrhosis or an immunocompromised state. Tolerance to the time delay was inversely proportional to age, while the deaths in patients aged 65 years or younger were related to serious concurrent diseases. Shock and renal failure occurred most often in elderly patients as a result of delayed surgery, and the leukocyte count was an age-dependent prognostic indicator. Thus, age, the time interval between perforation and treatment, serious concurrent disease, shock, and renal failure were presumed to be the most important prognostic factors. Although definitive operations were performed on low-risk patients with an acceptably low mortality, it remains to be determined whether simpler procedures should be adopted for high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7981538     DOI: 10.1007/BF01636772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  24 in total

1.  A bacteriological study of perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  N Shinagawa; M Muramoto; S Sakurai; T Fukui; K Hori; M Taniguchi; K Mashita; A Mizuno; J Yura
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1991-01

2.  Acute perforated duodenal ulcer. An evaluation of surgical management.

Authors:  J L Sawyers; J L Herrington; J L Mulherin; W A Whitehead; B Mody; J Marsh
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

3.  Perforated duodenal ulcer in elderly patients.

Authors:  D S O'Riordain; P J O'Dwyer; N J O'Higgins
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1990-04

4.  Mortality and perforated peptic ulcer: a case for risk stratification in elderly patients.

Authors:  T T Irvin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A multifactorial analysis of factors related to lethality after treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. 1935-1985.

Authors:  C Svanes; H Salvesen; B Espehaug; O Søreide; K Svanes
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Perforated gastric ulcers. A plea for management by primary gastric resection.

Authors:  G S McGee; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-05

Review 7.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  P H Jordan; C Morrow
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  S S Mattingly; M D Ram; W O Griffen
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Emergency management of perforated peptic ulcers in the elderly patient.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; C G Bitondo; J M Burch; K L Mattox; G L Jordan; M E DeBakey
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J Boey; J Wong; G B Ong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  13 in total

1.  Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Mario Testini; Piero Portincasa; Giuseppe Piccinni; Germana Lissidini; Fabio Pellegrini; Luigi Greco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Low serum albumin may predict the need for gastric resection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J G Seow; Y R Lim; V G Shelat
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Impact of surgical delay on outcomes in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery: A single center experience.

Authors:  Marc Ong; Tan Yu Guang; Tan Kok Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

Review 4.  [Ulcer surgery - what remains?].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; S P Mönig
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: a retrospective 14-year study.

Authors:  Mutlu Unver; Özgür Fırat; Ömer Vedat Ünalp; Alper Uğuz; Tufan Gümüş; Taylan Özgür Sezer; Şafak Öztürk; Tayfun Yoldaş; Sinan Ersin; Adem Güler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

6.  Perforated peptic ulcer and short-term mortality among tramadol users.

Authors:  Marie L Tørring; Anders Riis; Steffen Christensen; Reimar W Thomsen; Peter Jepsen; Jens Søndergaard; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Perforation of peptic ulcer following abrupt cessation of long-term opiate use.

Authors:  Mahdi Kahrom; Hadi Kahrom
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  A comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open emergent repair of perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Daniel L Davenport; Walker R Ueland; Shyanie Kumar; Margaret Plymale; Andrew C Bernard; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Is it possible to reduce the surgical mortality and morbidity of peptic ulcer perforations?

Authors:  Adnan Hut; Cihad Tatar; Doğan Yıldırım; Turgut Dönmez; Akın Ünal; Ahmet Kocakuşak; Muzaffer Akıncı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  Generalized peritonitis requiring re-operation after leakage of omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Hemmat Maghsoudi; Alireza Ghaffari
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.