Literature DB >> 23059052

Spectroscopic applications in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Hemant K Roy1, Vadim Backman.   

Abstract

One of the major frontiers in biomedical optics has been as an adjunct to gastrointestinal endoscopy. In particular, spectroscopy of elastic light scattering has the potential of addressing many of the vexing challenges confronting endoscopists. This review discusses the principles of spectroscopy and critically evaluates performance in clinically significant scenarios. One of the best established applications is optical biopsy (in situ histological determination), and a number of techniques such as elastic scattering spectroscopy have demonstrated the ability to discriminate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps. For flat dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus, some of the most promising spectroscopic technologies are angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry and endoscopic polarized scanning spectroscopy (the next generation light scattering spectroscopy). A new and exciting biological approach involves optical detection of field carcinogenesis. This can be exploited to reduce colonoscopic adenoma miss rate by assessing microcirculatory augmentation in the mucosa in the vicinity of the polyp using polarization-gatedspectroscopy. Furthermore, there are nano/micro-architectural correlates with diffuse field carcinogenesis throughout the colon. Indeed, technologies such as low coherence enhanced backscattering spectroscopy and partial wave spectroscopic microscopy have demonstrated that the detection of the nano-architectural alterations in the rectal mucosa can accurately sense advanced adenomas elsewhere in the colon. This may lend itself to a minimally intrusive risk stratification to identify patients who are most likely to harbor neoplasia and thus benefit from colonoscopy. Bridging these advances into the endoscopy suite requires pragmatic future development. Future studies need to focus on efficacy, cost, practicality (time required, etc), and particularly developing the paradigms that will impact upon clinical decision making.
Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23059052      PMCID: PMC3756813          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  28 in total

1.  Light-scattering technologies for field carcinogenesis detection: a modality for endoscopic prescreening.

Authors:  Vadim Backman; Hemant K Roy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Risk of malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus patients: results from a large population-based study.

Authors:  Shivaram Bhat; Helen G Coleman; Fouad Yousef; Brian T Johnston; Damian T McManus; Anna T Gavin; Liam J Murray
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Charles Kahi; Michael O'Brien; T R Levin; Heiko Pohl; Amit Rastogi; Larry Burgart; Tom Imperiale; Uri Ladabaum; Jonathan Cohen; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Field effect in cancer-an update.

Authors:  Hong Chai; Robert E Brown
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.256

5.  Multispectral scanning during endoscopy guides biopsy of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Le Qiu; Douglas K Pleskow; Ram Chuttani; Edward Vitkin; Jan Leyden; Nuri Ozden; Sara Itani; Lianyu Guo; Alana Sacks; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Mark D Modell; Eugene B Hanlon; Irving Itzkan; Lev T Perelman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Christoph M Seiler; Alexander Rickert; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Colonoscopy and optical biopsy: bridging technological advances to clinical practice.

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Michael J Goldberg; Shailesh Bajaj; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Rectal mucosal microvascular blood supply increase is associated with colonic neoplasia.

Authors:  Andrew J Gomes; Hemant K Roy; Vladimir Turzhitsky; Young Kim; Jeremy D Rogers; Sarah Ruderman; Valentina Stoyneva; Michael J Goldberg; Laura K Bianchi; Eugene Yen; Alexey Kromine; Mohammed Jameel; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Association between rectal optical signatures and colonic neoplasia: potential applications for screening.

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Vladimir Turzhitsky; Young Kim; Michael J Goldberg; Patrice Watson; Jeremy D Rogers; Andrew J Gomes; Alexey Kromine; Randall E Brand; Mohammed Jameel; Andrej Bogovejic; Prabhakar Pradhan; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  8 in total

1.  Polarization gating spectroscopy of normal-appearing duodenal mucosa to detect pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mihir Patel; Andrew Gomes; Sarah Ruderman; Darla Hardee; Sergio Crespo; Massimo Raimondo; Timothy Woodward; Vadim Backman; Hemant Roy; Michael Wallace
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Real-time Tracking and Classification of Tumor and Nontumor Tissue in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Resection Margin Assessment.

Authors:  Scarlet Nazarian; Ioannis Gkouzionis; Michal Kawka; Marta Jamroziak; Josephine Lloyd; Ara Darzi; Nisha Patel; Daniel S Elson; Christopher J Peters
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 16.681

Review 3.  Shifting focus in optical image-guided cancer therapy.

Authors:  Stijn Keereweer; Pieter B A A Van Driel; Dominic J Robinson; Clemens W G M Lowik
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Autofluorescence spectroscopy and imaging: a tool for biomedical research and diagnosis.

Authors:  A C Croce; G Bottiroli
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 5.  Advances in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  David G Graham; Matthew R Banks
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-12-16

6.  The Global Relationship between Chromatin Physical Topology, Fractal Structure, and Gene Expression.

Authors:  L M Almassalha; A Tiwari; P T Ruhoff; Y Stypula-Cyrus; L Cherkezyan; H Matsuda; M A Dela Cruz; J E Chandler; C White; C Maneval; H Subramanian; I Szleifer; H K Roy; V Backman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The use of optical imaging techniques in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Sabina Beg; Ana Wilson; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-09

8.  Multispectral light scattering endoscopic imaging of esophageal precancer.

Authors:  Le Qiu; Ram Chuttani; Douglas K Pleskow; Vladimir Turzhitsky; Umar Khan; Yuri N Zakharov; Lei Zhang; Tyler M Berzin; Eric U Yee; Mandeep S Sawhney; Yunping Li; Edward Vitkin; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Irving Itzkan; Lev T Perelman
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 17.782

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.