| Literature DB >> 23056476 |
Rajesh Narendran1, William G Frankle, Neale S Mason, Matthew F Muldoon, Bita Moghaddam.
Abstract
Studies in rodents indicate that diets deficient in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) lower dopamine neurotransmission as measured by striatal vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) density and amphetamine-induced dopamine release. This suggests that dietary supplementation with fish oil might increase VMAT2 availability, enhance dopamine storage and release, and improve dopamine-dependent cognitive functions such as working memory. To investigate this mechanism in humans, positron emission tomography (PET) was used to measure VMAT2 availability pre- and post-supplementation of n-3 PUFA in healthy individuals. Healthy young adult subjects were scanned with PET using [(11)C]-(+)-α-dihydrotetrabenzine (DTBZ) before and after six months of n-3 PUFA supplementation (Lovaza, 2 g/day containing docosahexaenonic acid, DHA 750 mg/d and eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA 930 mg/d). In addition, subjects underwent a working memory task (n-back) and red blood cell membrane (RBC) fatty acid composition analysis pre- and post-supplementation. RBC analysis showed a significant increase in both DHA and EPA post-supplementation. In contrast, no significant change in [(11)C]DTBZ binding potential (BP(ND)) in striatum and its subdivisions were observed after supplementation with n-3 PUFA. No correlation was evident between n-3 PUFA induced change in RBC DHA or EPA levels and change in [(11)C]DTBZ BP(ND) in striatal subdivisions. However, pre-supplementation RBC DHA levels was predictive of baseline performance (i.e., adjusted hit rate, AHR on 3-back) on the n-back task (y = 0.19+0.07, r(2) = 0.55, p = 0.009). In addition, subjects AHR performance improved on 3-back post-supplementation (pre 0.65±0.27, post 0.80±0.15, p = 0.04). The correlation between n-back performance, and DHA levels are consistent with reports in which higher DHA levels is related to improved cognitive performance. However, the lack of change in [(11)C]DBTZ BP(ND) indicates that striatal VMAT2 regulation is not the mechanism of action by which n-3 PUFA improves cognitive performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23056476 PMCID: PMC3463539 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
RBC fatty acid composition analysis.
| Type | PUFA | Pre- n3PUFA | Post- n3PUFA | t | df | p-value |
| n–3 PUFA | ALA | 0.4±0.1 | 0.4±0.1 | 0.11 | 10 | 0.92 |
| DHA | 2.9±1.0 | 5.1±1.2 | −9.89 | 10 | <0.01 | |
| EPA | 0.4±0.1 | 1.8±0.8 | −6.30 | 10 | <0.01 | |
| n–6 PUFA | LA | 21.7±5.1 | 21.9±3.8 | −0.13 | 10 | 0.90 |
| AA | 13.9±2.0 | 12.2±2.0 | 3.49 | 10 | 0.01 |
Values are mean and standard deviation (SD), n = 11 per condition.
p-values are from two-tailed, paired t tests; t is t statistic; df is degrees of freedom.
Figure 1A and B show the increase in RBC DHA and EPA over the course of the six-month study, i.e., from pre-supplementation levels at baseline (0-month) to post-supplementation levels prior to the [11C]DTBZ PET scan (6-months).
Adjusted hit rate from the n-back working memory task.
| n-back | Pre- n3PUFA | Post- n3PUFA | t | df | p-value |
| 1-back | 0.98±0.04 | 0.99±0.02 | −1.480 | 10 | 0.17 |
| 2-back | 0.93±0.10 | 0.94±0.09 | −0.399 | 10 | 0.70 |
| 3-back | 0.65±0.27 | 0.80±0.15 | −2.292 | 10 | 0.04 |
Values are mean and standard deviation (SD), n = 11 per condition.
p-values are from two-tailed, paired t tests; t is t statistic; df is degrees of freedom.
Figure 2Shows the relationship between pre-supplementation RBC DHA or EPA in x-axis and pre-supplementation performance (AHR) in 3-back test in y-axis.
The AHR ranges from 1 (best performance) to −1 (worst performance), with a score of 0 corresponding to performance at chance level. RBC DHA (Panel A), but not EPA (Panel B) was associated with performance in the task.
Scan parameters.
| Parameter | Pre- n3PUFA | Post- n3 PUFA | t | df | p-value |
| Injected dose (mCi) | 16.0±0.6 | 16.0±0.5 | −0.09 | 10 | 0.93 |
| SA (Ci/mmoles) | 2973±1543 | 3189±1288 | −0.35 | 10 | 0.73 |
| Injected Mass (ug) | 2.8±2.6 | 2.1±1.0 | 0.86 | 10 | 0.41 |
| Free Fraction,fp (%) | 30.2±2.9 | 30.9±2.8 | −0.57 | 9 | 0.58 |
| Clearance(L/h) | 72.3±17.4 | 67.4±21.0 | 0.70 | 9 | 0.50 |
| Occipital VT(mL cm-3) | 3.80±0.89 | 3.38±1.05 | 1.31 | 9 | 0.22 |
Values are mean and standard deviation (SD), n = 11 per condition (unless noted as different).
p-values are from two-tailed, paired t tests; t is t statistic; df is degrees of freedom.
n = 10/condition.
Regional [C]DTBZ binding potential (BPND).
| Functional subdivison | Anatomical subdivisoon | Pre- n3 PUFA | Post- n3 PUFA | DELTA BPND | t | df | p-value |
| Limbic striatum | Ventral Striatum | 1.69±0.11 | 1.62±0.18 | −4.1±8.8 | 1.53 | 10 | 0.16 |
| Associative striatum | 1.82±0.18 | 1.78±0.22 | −1.9±7.6 | 0.79 | 10 | 0.45 | |
| Precommisural dorsal caudate | 1.83±0.19 | 1.80±0.23 | −1.8±7.6 | 0.78 | 10 | 0.46 | |
| Postcommissural caudate | 1.44±0.19 | 1.43±0.27 | −1.0±10.1 | 0.24 | 10 | 0.82 | |
| Precommisural anterior putamen | 2.09±0.21 | 2.03±0.22 | −2.8±7.3 | 1.30 | 10 | 0.22 | |
| Sensori-motor striatum | Postcommisural putamen | 2.50±0.23 | 2.39±0.22 | −3.9±8.2 | 1.54 | 10 | 0.15 |
| Whole striatum | 2.03±0.18 | 1.96±0.21 | −3.1±7.7 | 1.26 | 10 | 0.24 |
Values are mean and standard deviation (SD), n = 11 per condition.
Associative striatum values are a weighted average of Precommissural dorsal caudate, Postcommissural caudate, and Precommissural anterior putamen; Whole striatum values are a weighted average of the five anatomical subdivisions.
p-values are from two-tailed, paired t tests; t is t statistic; df is degrees of freedom.