| Literature DB >> 23056352 |
Roxanne J Larsen1, Michelle C Knapp, Hugh H Genoways, Faisal Ali Anwarali Khan, Peter A Larsen, Don E Wilson, Robert J Baker.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptic morphological variation in the Chiropteran genus Myotis limits the understanding of species boundaries and species richness within the genus. Several authors have suggested that it is likely there are unrecognized species-level lineages of Myotis in the Neotropics. This study provides an assessment of the diversity in New World Myotis by analyzing cytochrome-b gene variation from an expansive sample ranging throughout North, Central, and South America. We provide baseline genetic data for researchers investigating phylogeographic and phylogenetic patterns of Myotis in these regions, with an emphasis on South America. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23056352 PMCID: PMC3463536 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Number of recognized species of New World Myotis based on general region and genetic distance value comparisons.
| Region | Recognized | Endemic | ≥2.0% | ≥5.0% | n | Average pairwise divergence(Standard Error) |
| NA | 26 | 18 | 25 | 13 | 41 | 13.73% (0.69) |
| CA | 11 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12.97% (0.78) |
| CB | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 8.13% (0.6) |
| SA | 15 | 9 | 34 | 18 | 74 | 12.85% (0.66) |
| Total | 42 (32*) | 31 | 67 | 37 | 136 | 13.14% (1.26) |
Number of recognized species and number of endemic species based on the current literature [12]–[16]. Note the number of genetic lineages by region and the total in each instance: all ≥2.0% genetic divergence and all ≥5.0% divergence (some species are found in more than one region). Asterisk indicates the number of currently recognized species represented in our dataset. n = number of individuals sequenced from the region. Average divergence value and standard error by region is also listed. Abbreviations: NA = North America, CA = Central America, CB = Caribbean, SA = South America.
Figure 1Distribution of collecting localities for specimens used in this study.
Numbers of specimens from each general region are as follows: South America (135), North America (51), Caribbean (17), and Central America (8). Four specimens were Old World representatives and are not shown. Map generated using the planiglobe ® (http://www.planiglobe.com/omc_set.html) digital vector map tool.
Figure 2Bayesian phylogram of cytochrome-b sequence data (n = 140).
Species names are based on museum and field records. Bolded species names are currently recognized by Simmons [13] and serve as the species representative (from GenBank [2], [3], [16] or from specimens sequenced herein). Black bolded branches are lineages that are ≥5.0% divergent and red bolded branches are lineages ≥2.0% divergent. Bolded numbers within species names indicate specimens that were originally identified as the named species, but were found to be independent lineages that are ≥5.0% divergent. The pound sign (#) indicates all specimens originally identified as M. nigricans. OW = Old World lineages of M. brandtii and M. gracilis. Kerivoula papillosa and M. latirostris are outgroup taxa but are not shown in the phylogram. Support for nodes are presented as Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 (*), maximum likelihood bootstrap pseudo-replicate values ≥75% (**), or support in both analyses (***). Additional specimen information is in Table S1.
Figure 3Kimura 2-parameter pairwise distances based on cytochrome-b sequence data.
Y-axis indicates the number of total pairwise comparisons of sequences and the X-axis indicates the Kimura 2-paramter distance values among ingroup taxa. Note the large portion of pairwise values over 10% (average divergence of 13.14%).
Figure 4Diversity estimates based on currently recognized species and genetic lineages presented herein.
The number of lineages restricted to each region (distributions based on [12]–[16]) is shown as a percentage of the total. A) percentage of diversity in each region based on currently recognized diversity, B) percentage of diversity in each region based on a species divergence level set at ≥5.0% using cytochrome-b DNA sequence data, C) percentage of diversity in each region based on a species divergence level set at ≥2.0%. Note the proportion of lineages from each region changes from the current levels, when compared to the lineages at 5.0% and 2.0%.
Species lineage information based on cytochrome-b analyses.
| Name | Recognized Subspecies | Distribution | n | General Colleting Locality | ≥2% | ≥5% |
|
| southern MX, CA to SA | 17 | Bolivia*, Ecuador, Honduras, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname | 7 | 4 | |
|
| 2 | south-western US, MX to northern CA | 2 | Mexico* | 2 | 1 |
|
| 4 | western US and MX | 4 | Mexico* | 3 | 2 |
|
| Dominica, Guadeloupe | 2 | Dominica* | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | southern MX to northern CA | 2 | Mexico | 2 | 1 |
|
| 2 | north-eastern MX, CA, to north and central SA, Trinidad | 4 | El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico* | 3 | 3 |
|
| eastern NA | 2 | Mexico, New York* | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | central SA | 2 | Argentina, Brazil* | 2 | 1 |
|
| Martinique, Barbados | 6 | Martinique* | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | Bonaire, Curacao, Venezuela | 2 | Bonaire* | 1 | 1 |
|
| 3 | central MX, CA to SA, Trinidad and Tobago, St.Martin, Montserrat, Grenada | 29 | Bolivia, Brazil*, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay,Peru, Suriname, Tobago, Venezuela | 16 | 12 |
|
| Barbados, Grenada | 4 | Barbados*, Grenada | 1 | 1 | |
|
| CA to north and central SA, Trinidad and Tobago | 10 | Brazil*, Ecuador, Paraguay, Suriname, Venezuela | 6 | 3 | |
|
| Amazon basin of central SA and south-central SA | 4 | Brazil*, Ecuador, Peru | 3 | 3 | |
|
| 14 | Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay,Peru, Venezuela | 11 | 8 | ||
|
| 4 | NA | 6 | Mexico, Texas* | 3 | 2 |
|
| 5 | south-western and south-central US to central CA | 6 | El Salvador, Mexico*, Texas | 4 | 1 |
|
| 6 | western NA | 2 | California*, Mexico | 2 | 2 |
Note the number of lineages within each species with ≥5.0% and 2.0% divergence values. Number of currently recognized subspecies are based on Simmons [13] and distributions are based on Simmons [13] and Wilson [14]. n = number of individuals sequenced from each species. Asterisks indicate the general collecting locality of GenBank specimens. Abbreviations: MX = Mexico, US = United States.