Literature DB >> 23052635

Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.

Young-Hoo Kim1, Jang-Won Park, Jun-Shik Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The literature lacks studies that confirm whether the improved radiographic alignment that can be achieved with computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty improves patients’ activities of daily living or the durability of total knee prostheses. The purpose of this study was to determine whether computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty improves the clinical function, alignment, and survivorship of the components.
METHODS: We prospectively compared the results of 520 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty for one knee and conventional total knee arthroplasty for the other. The assignment of the knee to navigation or not was done randomly. There were 452 women (904 knees) and sixty-eight men (136 knees) with a mean age of sixty-eight years (range, forty-nine to eighty-eight years) at the time of the index arthroplasty. The mean follow-up period was 10.8 years (range, ten to twelve years). The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically with the rating system of the Knee Society and with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at three months, one year, and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: Total knee scores, knee function scores, pain scores, WOMAC scores, knee motion, and activity scores did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups preoperatively or at the time of the final follow-up. Alignment and the survivorship of the components were not significantly different between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision as the end point at 10.8 years was 98.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.00) in the computernavigated total knee arthroplasty group and 99.2% (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.00) in the conventional total knee arthroplasty group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated no difference in clinical function or alignment and survivorship of the components between the knees that underwent computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty and those that underwent conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052635     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  37 in total

Review 1.  Shorter survival rate in varus-aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-Xiao Liu; Ping Shang; Xiao-Zhou Ying; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A randomized controlled clinical and radiological trial about outcomes of navigation-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  E K Song; Pranav R Agrawal; S K Kim; H Y Seo; J K Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Henning Windhagen; Christian Krettek; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Differences in component and limb alignment between computer-assisted and conventional surgery total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Kuo-Ti Peng; Kuo-Chin Huang; Mel S Lee; Robert Wen-Wei Hsu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Computer-assisted navigation is beneficial both in primary and revision surgery with modular rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Björn G Ochs; Anna J Schreiner; Peter M de Zwart; Ulrich Stöckle; Christoph Emanuel Gonser
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Computer Navigation-Assisted Knee Replacement Demonstrates Improved Outcome Compared with Conventional Knee Replacement at Mid-Term Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charles Ayekoloye; Osondu Nwangwu; Temitope Alonge
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Encouraging treatment algorithm for computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA): A retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  J Cip; M Widemschek; C Bach; P Ruckenstuhl; T Benesch; K Studer; A Martin
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-24

10.  Computerized navigation for total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower complications and ninety-day readmissions: a nationwide linked analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Gausden; Joseph E Popper; Peter K Sculco; Barret Rush
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.