Literature DB >> 23052233

[Correction of auricle deformities after failed otoplasty].

A Berghaus1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Failed otoplasty can result in deformities which are more annoying than the preoperative state of prominent ears, especially if aggressive cutting or scoring techniques are used. This article describes how such deformities can be corrected successfully.
METHODS: Ugly creases and edges can be corrected through readapting the cartilage edges followed by revision otoplasty using suture techniques. If cartilage defects are present, porous polyethylene implants can restore an aesthetic form of the auricle.
RESULTS: The author has successfully treated 16 severe ear deformities after failed otoplasty in the last 3 years with the procedures described.
CONCLUSIONS: The author recommends reconstructing the cartilaginous skeleton and redoing otoplasty with suture techniques rather than merely camouflaging creases with fascia or preserved materials. Porous polyethylene implants can successfully be used instead of autogenous cartilage to reconstruct a missing ear cartilage skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052233     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-012-2569-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  17 in total

Review 1.  Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review.

Authors:  Patrick Kelley; Larry Hollier; Samuel Stal
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 2.  Complications of otoplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  G C Limandjaja; C C Breugem; A B Mink van der Molen; M Kon
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty--A study of 203 cases.

Authors:  A Mandal; H Bahia; T Ahmad; K J Stewart
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures.

Authors:  D W Furnas
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  [On the position and shape of the human auricle].

Authors:  E Wodak
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1967

6.  Auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks: outcome and patient benefit in 65 children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; Sonja Gratza; Sven Becker; Ilona Schwentner; Klaus Stelter; Martin Patscheider; Alexander Berghaus; John Martin Hempel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Health-related quality of life, patient benefit, and clinical outcome after otoplasty using suture techniques in 62 children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; Thomas Hainzinger; Klaus Stelter; Eike Krause; Alexander Berghaus; John Martin Hempel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A new method of costal cartilage harvest for total auricular reconstruction: part I. Avoidance and prevention of intraoperative and postoperative complications and problems.

Authors:  Yasuyo Kawanabe; Satoru Nagata
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Otoplasty: critical review of clinical results.

Authors:  P A Adamson; B L McGraw; G J Tropper
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Ear reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework and temporoparietal fascia flap.

Authors:  John F Reinisch; Sheryl Lewin
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 1.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.