Literature DB >> 14501322

Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review.

Patrick Kelley1, Larry Hollier, Samuel Stal.   

Abstract

Prominent ear deformity is the most common abnormality of the external ear. Over two hundred different techniques have been described to correct this deformity. Many of these techniques have proven successful in their ability to achieve high patient satisfaction despite the significant variations in these techniques. From this perspective otoplasty is a privileged procedure allowing the surgeon great latitude in his approach and ability to achieve patient satisfaction. Despite high patient satisfaction, each technique has inherent strengths and weaknesses. The art of otoplasty is in the ability to realize the strengths and weaknesses of a cadre of procedures so as to maximize benefit and minimize complication. Analysis and correction of prominent ears should be approached in a rational, step-wise fashion. The external ear is an infinitely complex structure with great variation between individuals and between the two sides of the same individual. Appropriate evaluation is essential to the application of the appropriate corrective technique. Our approach to otoplasty includes a careful evaluation and description of the deformity in the context of normative standards and the goal of symmetry. When the patient is judged to be sufficiently mature we proceed with an algorithmic application of cartilage-sparing techniques suited to the specific deformity. In this approach, correction of the prominent ear can go beyond patient satisfaction, maximizing outcome in form and symmetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14501322     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200309000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  13 in total

1.  Optimal Electromechanical Reshaping of the Auricular Ear and Long-term Outcomes in an In Vivo Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Cyrus T Manuel; Tjoson Tjoa; Tony Nguyen; Erica Su; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  [Correction of auricle deformities after failed otoplasty].

Authors:  A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Otoplasty and quality of life].

Authors:  T Braun; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  The Protruding Ear: Cosmetic and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kausar Ali; Jesse D Meaike; Renata S Maricevich; Asaf Olshinka
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Comparison of the result of consolidative technique otoplasty and incisionless otoplasty in the repairs of prominent ears.

Authors:  Metin Temel; Ş Şamil Kahraman; Özge Berber; Cengiz Çevik; Ertap Akoğlu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Otoplasty - techniques, characteristics and risks.

Authors:  Andreas Naumann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

7.  Complications of auricular correction.

Authors:  Otto Staindl; Vanessa Siedek
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

8.  Prominent ears: Anthropometric study of the external ear of primary school children of Harare, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Wilfred Muteweye; Godfrey I Muguti
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-20

9.  A retrospective study of patient outcomes and satisfaction following pinnaplasty.

Authors:  Nicholas Hope; Caroline P Smith; Jim R Cullen; Neil McCluney
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2016-05-24

10.  Non-surgical Management of Congenital Auricular Deformities.

Authors:  Ali Akbar Mohammadi; Mohammad Taghi Imani; Sina Kardeh; Mehrab Mohammad Karami; Masoomeh Kherad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.