Literature DB >> 20697314

Health-related quality of life, patient benefit, and clinical outcome after otoplasty using suture techniques in 62 children and adults.

Thomas Braun1, Thomas Hainzinger, Klaus Stelter, Eike Krause, Alexander Berghaus, John Martin Hempel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The available medical literature lacks data about the effect of otoplasty on health-related quality of life.
METHODS: In the present study, 84 patients, having received otoplasty using a suture technique, were asked to answer validated questionnaires (the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory, respectively); Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory scores can range from -100 (maximal adverse effect) through 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximal positive effect).
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (73.8 percent) returned a valid questionnaire. For the adults' cohort (n=21), the mean total Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was 30.6; 100.0 percent were satisfied with the aesthetic result, and 90.5 percent would again decide in favor of the operation. For the children's cohort (n=41), the mean total Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory score was 24.1; 95.1 percent of the parents and 95.1 percent of the children were satisfied with the aesthetic result; and 97.6 percent of the parents and 92.7 percent of the children would again decide in favor of the operation. The health-related quality of life was elevated in 95.2 percent of the adults and 95.1 percent of the children. The additional compilation of clinical outcome parameters and complications confirmed the effectiveness and safety of an otoplasty using suture techniques.
CONCLUSION: Otoplasty using suture techniques can significantly increase patients' health-related quality of life and leads to a high rate of patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20697314     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f449c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  15 in total

1.  Quality of life and patients' satisfaction after otoplasty.

Authors:  C Bermueller; H Kirsche; A Sebert; N Rotter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Health-related quality of life outcome of children with prominent ears after otoplasty.

Authors:  Murat Songu; Ayse Kutlu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Correction of auricle deformities after failed otoplasty].

Authors:  A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Functional and aesthetic rehabilitation of microtia in children and adolescents].

Authors:  J M Hempel; T Braun; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Otoplasty and quality of life].

Authors:  T Braun; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Clinical results and health-related quality of life in otoplasty patients using cartilage resection and suturing methods.

Authors:  Yuksel Toplu; Emrah Sapmaz; Cemal Firat; Sibel Altunisik Toplu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Developmental disorders of the ear in children and adolescents: conservative and surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; John Martin Hempel; Alexander Berghaus
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  A retrospective study of patient outcomes and satisfaction following pinnaplasty.

Authors:  Nicholas Hope; Caroline P Smith; Jim R Cullen; Neil McCluney
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2016-05-24

9.  Earfold Implantable Clip System for Correction of Prominent Ears: Analysis of Safety in 403 Patients.

Authors:  Norbert V Kang; Nilesh Sojitra; Sinisa Glumicic; Jacobus A Vlok; Greg O'Toole; S Alam Hannan; Walid Sabbagh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-12

Review 10.  The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure.

Authors:  J Hendry; A Chin; I R C Swan; M A Akeroyd; G G Browning
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.