Literature DB >> 21807476

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon graft: a comparative study with 2-year follow-up results of semitendinosus tendon grafts alone or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon grafts.

Yasuo Niki1, Hideo Matsumoto, Akihiro Hakozaki, Hiroya Kanagawa, Yoshiaki Toyama, Yasunori Suda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical results of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by use of bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon (BPTB-G) grafts and to compare them with the results of double-bundle ACL reconstruction by use of semitendinosus tendon (ST) or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon (ST-G) grafts, with particular emphasis on the postoperative incidence of anterior knee pain.
METHODS: The study comprised 144 patients who underwent unilateral anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 3 graft types, including 55 BPTB-G, 56 ST, and 33 ST-G grafts. A traumatic graft rupture occurred within 2 years postoperatively in 5 patients (1 BPTB-G, 3 ST, and 1 ST-G). Clinical results and incidence and severity of anterior knee pain were assessed and compared among the 3 different graft groups at 2 years postoperatively. Potential variables influencing postoperative anterior knee pain development were subjected to univariate analysis, followed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for anterior knee pain.
RESULTS: Both subjective and objective clinical results in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with BPTB-G graft were similar to those using ST or ST-G graft at 2 years postoperatively. The incidences of anterior knee pain at 2 years' follow-up were 18.5%, 9.4%, and 9.3% in the BPTB-G, ST, and ST-G groups, respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that BPTB graft harvest and patellofemoral cartilage defect failed to be significant factors for anterior knee pain whereas quadriceps peak torque at 60°/s was the only significant factor for anterior knee pain at 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical results including the incidence of anterior knee pain 2 years after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with BPTB-G grafts were comparable to those after ACL reconstruction with ST or ST-G grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21807476     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  17 in total

1.  Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Akihiro Hakozaki; Wataru Iwamoto; Hiroya Kanagawa; Hideo Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Size comparison of ACL footprint and reconstructed auto graft.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Kenji Shirakura; Hiroshi Yorifuji; Shin Aizawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  ACL footprint size is correlated with the height and area of the lateral wall of femoral intercondylar notch.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Kenji Shirakura; Hiroshi Yorifuji; Shin Aizawa; Tohru Murakami; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Commonly used ACL autograft areas do not correlate with the size of the ACL footprint or the femoral condyle.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Keinosuke Ryu; Hiroshi Yorifuji; Shin Aizawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Use of ultrasonography to evaluate the dynamics of the infrapatellar fat pad after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Takashi Kitagawa; Junsuke Nakase; Yasushi Takata; Kengo Shimozaki; Kazuki Asai; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Evaluation of ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area for reconstructed autograft selection.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Hiroshi Yorifuji; Shin Aizawa; Yuki Tajika; Tohru Murakami; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Yan Ling Su; Hui Jian Cao; Fei Wang; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng; Ying Ze Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Structural and functional analysis of the semitendinosus tendon after harvest for soft tissue reconstructive procedures: a dynamic ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Ramesh C Srinivasan; Michael J Salata; Brian Downie; Jon A Jacobson; Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Effects of femoral bone tunnel characteristics on graft-bending angle in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the outside-in and transportal techniques.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Katsuya Nagai; Kengo Harato; Yasunori Suda; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Proportional evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint size and knee bony morphology.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Keinosuke Ryu; Shin Aizawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.