Literature DB >> 8280323

Comparison of perioperative morbidity of anterior cruciate ligament autografts versus allografts.

S R Saddemi1, A D Frogameni, P J Fenton, J Hartman, W Hartman.   

Abstract

We present a retrospective report of 50 patients (31 autograft and 19 allograft patients) who underwent arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions between August 1988 and September 1990. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The purpose of this study was to analyze each group regarding hospital stay, swelling, thigh atrophy, laxity, strength, endurance, range of motion, patellofemoral symptoms, and complications. We found no statistical difference between autograft or allograft ACL reconstructions with regard to perioperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8280323     DOI： 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80398-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN： 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  13 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft.

Authors:  James L Carey; Warren R Dunn; Diane L Dahm; Scott L Zeger; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Yan Ling Su; Hui Jian Cao; Fei Wang; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng; Ying Ze Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Wei Yao; Qi Wang; Liang Zhang; Chao Zhang; Bin Zhang; Yan-Jun Zhang; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-16

4.  Revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus allograft: intermediate-term outcome.

Authors:  S Chougule; G Tselentakis; Stefania Stefan; Georgeos Stefanakis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-14

5.  Healing of the patellar tendon after harvesting of its mid-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and evolution of the unclosed donor site defect.

Authors:  E Adriani; P P Mariani; G Maresca; N Santori
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ha Sung Kim; Jong Keun Seon; Ah Reum Jo
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-29

Review 7.  Autograft versus nonirradiated allograft tissue for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael W Mariscalco; Robert A Magnussen; Divyesh Mehta; Timothy E Hewett; David C Flanigan; Christopher C Kaeding
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Donor-site morbidity after harvest of a bone-tendon-bone patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  D Kohn; A Sander-Beuermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Comparative study of autograft or allograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  T Kustos; L Bálint; P Than; Tamás Bárdos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Rick W Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.