Literature DB >> 23052114

Are undesirable contact kinematics minimized after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? An intersurgeon analysis of consecutive patients.

Stephen M Howell1, Esther E Hodapp, Joseph V Vernace, Maury L Hull, Thomas D Meade.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tibiofemoral contact kinematics or knee implant motions have a direct influence on patient function and implant longevity and should be evaluated for any new alignment technique such as kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Edge loading of the tibial liner and external rotation (reverse of normal) and adduction of the tibial component on the femoral component are undesirable contact kinematics that should be minimized. Accordingly, this study determined whether the overall prevalence of undesirable contact kinematics during standing, mid kneeling near 90 degrees and full kneeling with kinematically aligned TKA are minimal and not different between groups of consecutive patients treated by different surgeons.
METHODS: Three surgeons were asked to perform cemented, kinematically aligned TKA with patient-specific guides in a consecutive series of patients with their preferred cruciate-retaining (CR) implant. In vivo tibiofemoral contact positions were obtained using a 3- to 2-dimensional image registration technique in 69 subjects (Vanguard CR-TKA N = 22, and Triathlon CR-TKA N = 47).
RESULTS: Anterior or posterior edge loading of the tibial liner was not observed. The overall prevalence of external rotation of the tibial component on the femoral component of 6 % was low and not different between surgeons (n.s.). The overall prevalence of adduction of the tibial component on the femoral component of 4 % was low and not different between surgeons (n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: Kinematically aligned TKA minimized the undesirable contact kinematics of edge loading of the tibial liner, and external rotation and adduction of the tibial component on the femoral component during standing and kneeling, which suggests an optimistic prognosis for durable long-term function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052114     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2220-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis.

Authors:  Louis E Defrate; Ramprasad Papannagari; Thomas J Gill; Jeremy M Moses; Neil P Pathare; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  P N Baker; J H van der Meulen; J Lewsey; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-07

3.  Kneeling kinematics after total knee arthroplasty: anterior-posterior contact position of a standard and a high-flex tibial insert design.

Authors:  Kathryn M Coughlin; Stephen J Incavo; Robert R Doohen; Kazuyoshi Gamada; Scott Banks; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Gene Dossett; George J Swartz; Nicolette A Estrada; George W LeFevre; Bertram G Kwasman
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment.

Authors:  Brian A Klatt; Nitin Goyal; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

7.  Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E Windsor; G R Scuderi; M C Moran; J N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effect of femoral component rotation and patellar design on patellar forces.

Authors:  R Singerman; H D Pagan; A B Peyser; V M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Method for quantifying patient expectations and early recovery after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Stephanie L Rogers
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R A Berger; L S Crossett; J J Jacobs; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  22 in total

1.  [Individualized total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  A F Steinert; L Sefrin; M Hoberg; J Arnholdt; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Clinical faceoff: Neutrally versus kinematically aligned TKA.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Sam Oussedik; Michael B Cross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Stelios Papadopoulos; Kyle Kuznik; Lillian R Ghaly; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  External rotation of the femoral component decreases patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Terashima; Tomohiro Onodera; Naohiro Sawaguchi; Yasuhiko Kasahara; Tokifumi Majima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparison between cylindrical axis-reference and articular surface-reference femoral bone cut for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Katsuya Nagai; Tomoki Sassa; Kengo Harato; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty : Concept, evidence base and limitations].

Authors:  T Calliess; M Ettinger; C Stukenborg-Colsmann; H Windhagen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty limits high tibial forces, differences in tibial forces between compartments, and abnormal tibial contact kinematics during passive flexion.

Authors:  Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Handheld Navigation Device and Patient-Specific Cutting Guides Result in Similar Coronal Alignment for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael E Steinhaus; Alexander S McLawhorn; Shawn S Richardson; Patrick Maher; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-29

9.  Relationship of the posterior femoral axis of the "kinematically aligned" total knee arthroplasty to the posterior condylar, transepicondylar, and anteroposterior femoral axes.

Authors:  Andrew Park; Stephen T Duncan; Ryan M Nunley; James A Keeney; Robert L Barrack; Denis Nam
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Evaluation of the 3-dimensional, weight-bearing orientation of the normal adult knee.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Ritesh R Shah; Ryan M Nunley; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.