Literature DB >> 2305060

Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists.

W D Foley1, D R Jacobson, A J Taylor, L R Goodman, E T Stewart, J W Gurney, D Stroka.   

Abstract

Prototype electronic workstations incorporated in networks linking computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging systems are being developed. The authors compared observer efficiency and sensitivity in reading body CT studies from a two-screen workstation (1,000-line monitors and 12-bit dynamic range in image memory) and conventional film panel alternator. The two-screen workstation displayed 32 images at a matrix resolution of 256 x 256 or eight images at a matrix resolution of 512 x 512 simultaneously. Ninety-six images with a matrix resolution of 512 x 512 could be displayed simultaneously at the film panel alternator. Four observers read images from 20 cases, 10 with repeat examinations, in a randomized viewing sequence. There was an average of 32 images per case. Reporting time was less with the film panel alternator (average, 5.08 minutes) than with the workstation (average, 6.66 minutes). There was improved sensitivity for all observers in reading from the film panel alternator (range, 1%-12%) (P less than .05). In complex cases evaluated by means of body CT, the current prototype two-screen electronic workstation is limited by display capabilities.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305060     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.3.2305060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.

Authors:  H Usami; M Ikeda; T Ishigaki; H Fukushima; K Shimamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Practices and attitudes about cathode-ray tube-based and film-based image interpretation.

Authors:  B F Coughlin; S E Seltzer; R G Swensson; P F Judy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians.

Authors:  A Parasyn; R M Hanson; J K Peat; M De Silva
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Clinical assessment of Hokkaido University PACS.

Authors:  K Miyasaka; T Kudo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Processes involved in reading imaging studies: workflow analysis and implications for workstation development.

Authors:  S B Gay; A H Sobel; L Q Young; S J Dwyer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  How many screens does a CT workstation need?

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; K M Denelsbeck; R E Johnston
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; E D Pisano; K M Denelsbeck; D M Warshauer; M A Mauro; B Keefe; W H McCartney; C B Wilcox
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Designing a radiology workstation: a focus on navigation during the interpretation task.

Authors:  D Beard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 10.  Comparison of navigation techniques for large digital images.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger; Anne Bauers; Jian Yang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.056

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.