Literature DB >> 23049164

INAPPROPRIATE CONFIDENCE AND RETIREMENT PLANNING: FOUR STUDIES WITH A NATIONAL SAMPLE.

Andrew M Parker1, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Joanne Yoong, Robert Willis.   

Abstract

Financial decisions about investing and saving for retirement are increasingly complex, requiring financial knowledge and confidence in that knowledge. Few studies have examined whether direct assessments of individuals' confidence are related to the outcomes of their financial decisions. Here, we analyzed data from a national sample recruited through RAND's American Life Panel (ALP), an internet panel of U.S. adults aged 18 to 88. We examined the relationship of confidence with self-reported and actual financial decisions, using four different tasks, each performed by overlapping samples of ALP participants. The four tasks were designed by different researchers for different purposes, using different methods to assess confidence. Yet, measures of confidence were correlated across tasks, and results were consistent across methodologies. Confidence and knowledge showed only modest positive correlations. However, even after controlling for actual knowledge, individuals with greater confidence were more likely to report financial planning for retirement and to successfully minimize fees on a hypothetical investment task. Implications for the role of confidence (even if it is unjustified) in investment behavior is discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23049164      PMCID: PMC3462465          DOI: 10.1002/bdm.745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak        ISSN: 0894-3257


  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?

Authors:  K E Stanovich; R F West
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1999-09

3.  Metacognition, risk behavior, and risk outcomes: the role of perceived intelligence and perceived knowledge.

Authors:  James Jaccard; Tonya Dodge; Vincent Guilamo-Ramos
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling.

Authors:  Adam S Goodie
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2005

5.  Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Andrew M Parker; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-05

6.  The trouble with overconfidence.

Authors:  Don A Moore; Paul J Healy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Realism of confidence in obsessive-compulsive checkers.

Authors:  R Dar; S Rish; H Hermesh; M Taub; M Fux
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2000-11

8.  Positive Illusions and Forecasting Errors in Mutual Fund Investment Decisions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1999-08

9.  Identifying the Effects of Unjustified Confidence versus Overconfidence: Lessons Learned from Two Analytic Methods.

Authors:  Andrew M Parker; Eric R Stone
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2014-04
  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  FINANCIAL LITERACY, FINANCIAL EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC OUTCOMES.

Authors:  Justine S Hastings; Brigitte C Madrian; William L Skimmyhorn
Journal:  Annu Rev Econom       Date:  2013-05-01

2.  Eliciting probabilistic expectations: Collaborations between psychologists and economists.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Perspectives on Aging-Related Preparation.

Authors:  Silvia Sörensen; Rachel L Missell; Alexander Eustice-Corwin; Dorine A Otieno
Journal:  J Elder Policy       Date:  2021

4.  The multifold relationship between memory and decision making: an individual-differences study.

Authors:  Fabio Del Missier; Timo Mäntylä; Patrik Hansson; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Andrew M Parker; Lars-Göran Nilsson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Identifying the Effects of Unjustified Confidence versus Overconfidence: Lessons Learned from Two Analytic Methods.

Authors:  Andrew M Parker; Eric R Stone
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2014-04

Review 6.  New perspectives for motivating better decisions in older adults.

Authors:  JoNell Strough; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  Decision-Making Competence, Social Orientation, Time Style, and Perceived Stress.

Authors:  Martin Geisler; Carl Martin Allwood
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-09

8.  Competence and Quality in Real-Life Decision Making.

Authors:  Martin Geisler; Carl Martin Allwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.