Literature DB >> 17484614

Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.

Wändi Bruine de Bruin1, Andrew M Parker, Baruch Fischhoff.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated the reliability and validity of a set of 7 behavioral decision-making tasks, measuring different aspects of the decision-making process. The tasks were administered to individuals from diverse populations. Participants showed relatively consistent performance within and across the 7 tasks, which were then aggregated into an Adult Decision-Making Competence (A-DMC) index that showed good reliability. The validity of the 7 tasks and of overall A-DMC emerges in significant relationships with measures of socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, and decision-making styles. Participants who performed better on the A-DMC were less likely to report negative life events indicative of poor decision making, as measured by the Decision Outcomes Inventory. Significant predictive validity remains when controlling for demographic measures, measures of cognitive ability, and constructive decision-making styles. Thus, A-DMC appears to be a distinct construct relevant to adults' real-world decisions. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484614     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  90 in total

1.  Decision-making competence and attempted suicide.

Authors:  Katalin Szanto; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Andrew M Parker; Michael N Hallquist; Polina M Vanyukov; Alexandre Y Dombrovski
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Emotion, Affect, and Risk Communication with Older Adults: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Melissa L Finucane
Journal:  J Risk Res       Date:  2008

3.  Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; David E Kanouse; Steven C Martino; Dale Shaller; Lise Rybowski
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Assessing what to address in science communication.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ann Bostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Variations in Decision-Making Profiles by Age and Gender: A Cluster-Analytic Approach.

Authors:  Rebecca Delaney; JoNell Strough; Andrew M Parker; Wandi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2015-10-01

6.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks.

Authors:  Maggie E Toplak; Richard F West; Keith E Stanovich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

Review 7.  Age Differences in Self-Continuity: Converging Evidence and Directions for Future Research.

Authors:  Corinna E Löckenhoff; Joshua L Rutt
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-06-01

8.  Age and self-relevance effects on information search during decision making.

Authors:  Thomas M Hess; Tara L Queen; Gilda E Ennis
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Complementary cognitive capabilities, economic decision making, and aging.

Authors:  Ye Li; Martine Baldassi; Eric J Johnson; Elke U Weber
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-09

10.  Decision-making deficits among maltreated children.

Authors:  Joshua A Weller; Philip A Fisher
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2012-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.