Literature DB >> 23048007

The effect of electronic medical record system sophistication on preventive healthcare for women.

Namita L Tundia1, Christina M L Kelton, Teresa M Cavanaugh, Jeff J Guo, Dennis J Hanseman, Pamela C Heaton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of electronic medical record (EMR) system sophistication on preventive women's healthcare.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Providers in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), 2007-8, were included if they had at least one visit by a woman at least 21 years old. Based on 16 questions from NAMCS, the level of a provider's EMR system sophistication was classified as non-existent, minimal, basic, or fully functional. A two-stage residual-inclusion method was used with ordered probit regression to model the level of EMR system sophistication, and outcome-specific Poisson regressions to predict the number of examinations or tests ordered or performed.
RESULTS: Across the providers, 29.23%, 49.34%, 15.97%, and 5.46% had no, minimal, basic, and fully functional EMR systems, respectively. The breast examination rate was 20.27%, 34.96%, 37.21%, and 44.98% for providers without or with minimal, basic, and fully functional EMR systems, respectively. For breast examinations, pelvic examinations, Pap tests, chlamydia tests, cholesterol tests, mammograms, and bone mineral density (BMD) tests, an EMR system increased the number of these tests and examinations. Furthermore, the level of sophistication increased the number of breast examinations and Pap, chlamydia, cholesterol, and BMD tests. DISCUSSION: The use of advanced EMR systems in obstetrics and gynecology was limited. Given the positive results of this study, specialists in women's health should consider investing in more sophisticated systems.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an EMR system has a positive impact on preventive women's healthcare; the more functions that the system has, the greater the number of examinations and tests given or prescribed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23048007      PMCID: PMC3638189          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  18 in total

1.  Electronic medical records and the efficiency of hospital emergency departments.

Authors:  Michael F Furukawa
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Effectiveness of the electronic medical record in cholesterol management in patients with coronary artery disease (Virtual Lipid Clinic).

Authors:  J W Kinn; M F O'Toole; S M Rowley; J C Marek; V J Bufalino; A S Brown
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records?

Authors:  Catharine W Burt; Jane E Sisk
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings.

Authors:  Monique W M Jaspers; Marian Smeulers; Hester Vermeulen; Linda W Peute
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert C Burack; Phyllis A Gimotty; Michael Simon; Anita Moncrease; Peter Dews
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Views on health information sharing and privacy from primary care practices using electronic medical records.

Authors:  Gihan Perera; Anne Holbrook; Lehana Thabane; Gary Foster; Donald J Willison
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Development, implementation and evaluation of an electronic medical record prompt for bone density testing.

Authors:  Sharon J Rolnick; Jody M Jackson; Jerry H Amundson
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols.

Authors:  D K Litzelman; R S Dittus; M E Miller; W M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Mammography use among Black women: the role of electronic medical records.

Authors:  Cheryl R Clark; Nashira Baril; Marycarmen Kunicki; Natacha Johnson; Jane Soukup; Stuart Lipsitz; JudyAnn Bigby
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Michael Herson; Eric Orwoll; Chuhe Chen; Mikel Aickin; Martha C Swain
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  4 in total

1.  The content of diet and physical activity consultations with older adults in primary care.

Authors:  Shoshana H Bardach; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-04-01

2.  Clinical Decision Support Functions and Digitalization of Clinical Documents of Electronic Medical Record Systems.

Authors:  Young-Taek Park; Yeon Sook Kim; Byoung-Kee Yi; Sang Mi Kim
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2019-04-30

3.  Association between Full Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Drug Use: Antibiotics and Polypharmacy.

Authors:  Young-Taek Park; Donghwan Kim; Rae Woong Park; Koray Atalag; In Ho Kwon; Dukyong Yoon; Mona Choi
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2020-01-31

4.  Association between Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Healthcare Information Technology Infrastructure.

Authors:  Youn-Tae Lee; Young-Taek Park; Jae-Sung Park; Byoung-Kee Yi
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2018-10-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.