Literature DB >> 23047842

Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: do symptoms correlate with MR imaging findings?

Eric Y Chang1, James L McAnally, James R Van Horne, Sheronda Statum, Tanya Wolfson, Anthony Gamst, Christine B Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging abnormalities after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and to determine whether presence of symptoms correlates with findings at MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. MR imaging was performed with conventional sequences and a 1.5-T clinical imager in 192 hips (174 patients) evaluated during a 15-month period. Two observers retrospectively reviewed the images for the presence and size of pseudotumor, communication with the pseudocapsule, wall thickness, synovial hypertrophy, compartmentalization, solid components, foci of wall susceptibility, osteolysis, bone marrow edema, abductor muscle or tendon abnormality, and Anderson MR grade (normal, infection, or varying severity of metal-on-metal disease). These findings were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients by using the Fisher exact test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate.
RESULTS: Prevalence of pseudotumors per patient and per hip was 69% (120 of 174 patients, 132 of 192 hips). Bone marrow edema (present in six asymptomatic patients and 19 patients with pain, P < .01) and tendon tearing (present in five asymptomatic patients and 13 patients with pain, P < .05) were predictors of pain. Presence of symptoms was not correlated with presence (P = .4151) or size of pseudotumors. Anderson MR grade binarized into normal versus abnormal showed moderate agreement between readers (κ = 0.439) but was also not correlated with symptoms (P = .6648).
CONCLUSION: The presence of bone marrow edema and abductor tendon tears but not the presence or size of pseudotumor was associated with patient pain. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047842     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.

Authors:  Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Daniel K Hussey; Gabrielle S Donahue; Hollis G Potter; Robert Wallace; Charles Bragdon; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Robert L Barrack; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of painful metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Alain Petit; Viviane Khoury; Etienne Blain-Pare; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-07

5.  Metal artifact reduction with MAVRIC SL at 3-T MRI in patients with hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Soo-Jung Choi; Kevin M Koch; Brian A Hargreaves; Kathryn J Stevens; Garry E Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise?

Authors:  Reshid Berber; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

7.  What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Nick Bayley; Habeeb Khan; Paul Grosso; Thomas Hupel; David Stevens; Matthew Snider; Emil Schemitsch; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [MRI investigations in patients with problems due to metal-on-metal implants].

Authors:  T M Parsons; K Satchithananda; R Berbe; I A Siddiqui; E Robinson; A J Hart; A Hart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  No association between pseudotumors, high serum metal-ion levels and metal hypersensitivity in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at 5-7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mette Holm Hjorth; Maiken Stilling; Kjeld Soballe; Lars Hans Bolvig; Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen; Inger Mechlenburg; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  High metal ion levels after use of the ASR™ device correlate with development of pseudotumors and T cell activation.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer; Mats Bengtsson; Christina Lundberg; Jan Milbrink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.