Literature DB >> 23047840

Complicated inferior vena cava filter retrievals: associated factors identified at preretrieval CT.

Lu Anne V Dinglasan1, John C Oh, J Eric Schmitt, Scott O Trerotola, Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg, S William Stavropoulos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine filter characteristics at preretrieval computed tomography (CT) that are associated with complicated inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was HIPAA compliant, and informed consent was waived. Institutional review board-approved retrospective review of IVC filter retrievals between January 2002 and July 2011 was performed to identify patients with preretrieval CT in whom a complicated retrieval was performed, as defined by use of nonstandard techniques, filter fracture, filter tip incorporation into the IVC wall, and retrieval failure. Age- and sex-matched control subjects with standard IVC filter retrieval were used for comparison. Preretrieval CT images were evaluated for tilt angle in mediolateral and anteroposterior directions, CT appearance of tip embedding, degree of filter strut perforation, and distance of filter tip from the nearest renal vein. Dwell time was also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Fisher exact test, Student t test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on the variables being evaluated, as well as multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with complicated retrievals and 48 control subjects with uncomplicated retrievals were evaluable for preretrieval CT characteristics. Mediolateral and anteroposterior tilt angle, degree of perforation, and dwell time were higher for the complicated versus non-complicated retrieval group (P < .01). Odds of complicated retrieval were increased 129-fold with CT appearance of tip embedding (P < .0001), with an odds ratio of 33 with a tilt angle of more than 15° in any direction (P < .0001), while perforation and dwell time increased risk of a complicated retrieval by 10.7 (P < .0001) and 2.3 (P < .05) times, respectively. Distance from renal veins was noncontributory.
CONCLUSION: CT appearance of tip embedding, increased tilt angle, higher-grade perforation, and longer dwell times are associated with complicated IVC filter retrieval. Therefore, preretrieval CT may be warranted in select patients for identification of these characteristics to tailor retrieval approach or to arrange a referral to a tertiary center if necessary. RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047840     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

Review 1.  Procedural and indwelling complications with inferior vena cava filters: frequency, etiology, and management.

Authors:  Lazar Milovanovic; Sean A Kennedy; Mehran Midia
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Factors associated with reduced radiation exposure, cost, and technical difficulty of inferior vena cava filter placement and retrieval.

Authors:  Matthew Neill; Hearns W Charles; Daniel Pflager; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-01

3.  Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter retrieval using a bidirectional loop-snare technique.

Authors:  Jordan Ross; Stephen Allison; Sandeep Vaidya; Eric Monroe
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Inferior vena cava filter removal after prolonged dwell time of 2310 days.

Authors:  Ankit H Shah; Andrew Lichliter; Marco Cura
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-07

Review 5.  Endovascular Interventions for Acute and Chronic Lower Extremity Deep Venous Disease: State of the Art.

Authors:  Akhilesh K Sista; Suresh Vedantham; John A Kaufman; David C Madoff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Inferior vena cava filter insertion through the popliteal vein: enabling the percutaneous endovenous intervention of deep vein thrombosis with a single venous access approach in a single session.

Authors:  Hyoung Ook Kim; Jae Kyu Kim; Jin Gyoon Park; Nam Yeol Yim; Yang Jun Kang; Hye Doo Jung
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  An analysis of factors associated with increased fluoroscopy time or the need for complex techniques at IVC filter retrieval.

Authors:  Mark Kleedehn; Kelli Moore; Katherine Longo; Kaitlin Woo; Paul Laeseke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Over-the-Wire Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement: How We Do It.

Authors:  Xin Li; Jennifer Montgomery; Levester Kirksey; Sameer Gadani; Giuseppe D'Amico; Sasan Partovi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.780

9.  Can Pre-Retrieval Computed Tomography Predict the Difficult Removal of an Implementing an Inferior Vena Cava Filter?

Authors:  Shinho Hong; Keun-Myoung Park; Yong Sun Jeon; Soon Gu Cho; Kee Chun Hong; Woo Young Shin; Yun-Mee Choe
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2016-12-31

Review 10.  Retrievable inferior vena cava filters for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Han Ni; Lei Lei Win
Journal:  ISRN Radiol       Date:  2013-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.