Literature DB >> 23044673

A comparison of the quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients after IPAA vs ileostomy.

Kevin Kuruvilla1, Turner Osler, Neil H Hyman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total proctocolectomy with IPAA is frequently considered the procedure of choice for surgical patients with ulcerative colitis, presumably owing to an expectation of improved quality of life in comparison with an ileostomy.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to determine whether long-term quality of life among patients with a pelvic pouch is better than those who chose a permanent stoma.
DESIGN: This investigation is a cross-sectional observational study using a prospective database.
SETTING: This study was conducted at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who had undergone IPAA or a permanent ileostomy for ulcerative colitis by a single surgeon, presenting for their annual follow-up visit from July through September 2011, were offered participation in the study. A randomly chosen group of subjects who did not have scheduled appointments during the study period were sent a letter inviting them to participate in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures used were EQ-5D-3L, the Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire, the Cleveland Global Quality of Life instrument, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale, and the Stoma Quality of Life scale.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a pelvic pouch and 24 ostomates were accrued and comprehensively studied. Global quality-of-life scores were virtually identical for the 2 groups. Patients with a pelvic pouch had better subscores in current quality of health and energy level, Fazio score, sexuality/body image, and work/social function. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size, and some of our patients were enrolled through mailed surveys and, hence, nonresponse bias may be present. The follow-up time since surgery was longer in the pelvic pouch group than in the ileostomy group.
CONCLUSION: Informed patients with ulcerative colitis choosing an ileostomy have a health-related global quality of life very similar to patients with a pelvic pouch. Better outcomes in patients with an ileal pouch were most evident in the areas of sexuality/body image and work/social function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044673     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182690870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  14 in total

1.  Anxiety, depression, and inflammation after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Venkata Subhash Gorrepati; Sanjay Yadav; August Stuart; Walter Koltun; Evangelos Messaris; Emmanuelle D Williams; Matthew D Coates
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis : Long-term functional results and quality of life].

Authors:  E Rijcken; N Senninger; R Mennigen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Inflammatory bowel disease and sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Britt Christensen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-01

4.  Factors Associated with Long-Term Quality of Life After Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Olga A Lavryk; Luca Stocchi; Tracy L Hull; Emre Gorgun; Sherief Shawki; Jeremy M Lipman; Stefan D Holubar; Conor P Delaney; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Matsuoka; Taku Kobayashi; Fumiaki Ueno; Toshiyuki Matsui; Fumihito Hirai; Nagamu Inoue; Jun Kato; Kenji Kobayashi; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Kazutaka Koganei; Reiko Kunisaki; Satoshi Motoya; Masakazu Nagahori; Hiroshi Nakase; Fumio Omata; Masayuki Saruta; Toshiaki Watanabe; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takanori Kanai; Yoshinori Noguchi; Ken-Ichi Takahashi; Kenji Watanabe; Toshifumi Hibi; Yasuo Suzuki; Mamoru Watanabe; Kentaro Sugano; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Health State Utility Values for Ileostomies and Colostomies: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fahima Dossa; Jonathan Josse; Sergio A Acuna; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without primary diverting loop ileostomy if postoperative sepsis develops.

Authors:  O A Lavryk; T L Hull; L C Duraes; L Stocchi; J H Ashburn; D Liska; E Gorgun; H Kessler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Shannon Chang; Bo Shen; Feza Remzi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

9.  A Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Biologic and Non-Biologic Options for the Treatment of Adults with Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis after the Failure of Conventional Therapy.

Authors:  Paul Tappenden; Shijie Ren; Rachel Archer; Rebecca Harvey; Marrissa Martyn-St James; Hasan Basarir; John Stevens; Alan Lobo; Sami Hoque
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.