Literature DB >> 23043440

The adaptive value of morphological, behavioural and life-history traits in reproductive female wolves.

Daniel R Stahler1, Daniel R MacNulty, Robert K Wayne, Bridgett vonHoldt, Douglas W Smith.   

Abstract

Reproduction in social organisms is shaped by numerous morphological, behavioural and life-history traits such as body size, cooperative breeding and age of reproduction, respectively. Little is known, however, about the relative influence of these different types of traits on reproduction, particularly in the context of environmental conditions that determine their adaptive value. Here, we use 14 years of data from a long-term study of wolves (Canis lupus) in Yellowstone National Park, USA, to evaluate the relative effects of different traits and ecological factors on the reproductive performance (litter size and survival) of breeding females. At the individual level, litter size and survival improved with body mass and declined with age (c. 4-5 years). Grey-coloured females had more surviving pups than black females, which likely contributed to the maintenance of coat colour polymorphism in this system. The effect of pack size on reproductive performance was nonlinear as litter size peaked at eight wolves and then declined, and litter survival increased rapidly up to three wolves, beyond which it increased more gradually. At the population level, litter size and survival decreased with increasing wolf population size and canine distemper outbreaks. The relative influence of these different-level factors on wolf reproductive success followed individual > group > population. Body mass was the primary determinant of litter size, followed by pack size and population size. Body mass was also the main driver of litter survival, followed by pack size and disease. Reproductive gains because of larger body size and cooperative breeding may mitigate reproductive losses because of negative density dependence and disease. These findings highlight the adaptive value of large body size and sociality in promoting individual fitness in stochastic and competitive environments.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23043440     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02039.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  25 in total

Review 1.  Hybridization in human evolution: Insights from other organisms.

Authors:  Rebecca R Ackermann; Michael L Arnold; Marcella D Baiz; James A Cahill; Liliana Cortés-Ortiz; Ben J Evans; B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Robyn A Humphreys; Clifford J Jolly; Joanna Malukiewicz; Christopher J Percival; Terrence B Ritzman; Christian Roos; Charles C Roseman; Lauren Schroeder; Fred H Smith; Kerryn A Warren; Robert K Wayne; Dietmar Zinner
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2019-06-20

2.  Harvest and group effects on pup survival in a cooperative breeder.

Authors:  David E Ausband; Michael S Mitchell; Carisa R Stansbury; Jennifer L Stenglein; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Complex patterns of sex-biased demography in canines.

Authors:  Tanya N Phung; Robert K Wayne; Melissa A Wilson; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Pervasive Effects of Aging on Gene Expression in Wild Wolves.

Authors:  Pauline Charruau; Rachel A Johnston; Daniel R Stahler; Amanda Lea; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Douglas W Smith; Bridgett M vonHoldt; Steven W Cole; Jenny Tung; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management.

Authors:  Peter A H Westley; Andrew M Berdahl; Colin J Torney; Dora Biro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  How many cubs can a mum nurse? Maternal age and size influence litter size in polar bears.

Authors:  Dorinda Marie Folio; Jon Aars; Olivier Gimenez; Andrew E Derocher; Øystein Wiig; Sarah Cubaynes
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.

Authors:  Marco Galaverni; Romolo Caniglia; Pietro Milanesi; Silvana Lapalombella; Elena Fabbri; Ettore Randi
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  The concerted impact of domestication and transposon insertions on methylation patterns between dogs and grey wolves.

Authors:  Ilana Janowitz Koch; Michelle M Clark; Michael J Thompson; Kerry A Deere-Machemer; Jun Wang; Lionel Duarte; Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan; Eskender L McCoy; Liudmilla Rubbi; Daniel R Stahler; Matteo Pellegrini; Elaine A Ostrander; Robert K Wayne; Janet S Sinsheimer; Bridgett M vonHoldt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Heritability of interpack aggression in a wild pedigreed population of North American grey wolves.

Authors:  Bridgett M vonHoldt; Alexandra L DeCandia; Elizabeth Heppenheimer; Ilana Janowitz-Koch; Ruoyao Shi; Hua Zhou; Christopher A German; Kristin E Brzeski; Kira A Cassidy; Daniel R Stahler; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  K Locus Effects in Gray Wolves: Experimental Assessment of TLR3 Signaling and the Gene Expression Response to Canine Distemper Virus.

Authors:  Rachel A Johnston; James G Rheinwald; Bridgett M vonHoldt; Daniel R Stahler; William Lowry; Jenny Tung; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.