Literature DB >> 23042984

In vitro particle size distributions in electronic and conventional cigarette aerosols suggest comparable deposition patterns.

Yaping Zhang1, Walton Sumner, Da-Ren Chen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette users ("vapers") inhale aerosols of water, nicotine, and propylene glycol (PG) or vegetable glycerin (VG). Aerosol particle sizes should affect deposition patterns in vapers and bystanders.
METHODS: Aerosols were generated by a smoking machine and an electronic cigarette filled with 16mg/ml nicotine in aqueous PG or VG solution. A scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) counted particles of 10-1,000 nm diameters. A single puff experiment counted particles immediately and after aging 10 and 40 s. A steady-state experiment counted particles emitted from a collection chamber, untreated and after desiccation or organic vapor removal. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) human respiratory tract model was used to estimate deposition. Results were compared to similar data from reference cigarettes.
RESULTS: Puffs generated peak particle counts at (VG) 180 nm and (PG) 120 nm. Steady-state peaks occurred around 400 nm. Organic vapor removal eliminated small particles and reduced the size and number of large particles. Desiccation reduced the total volume of particles by 70% (VG, small PG) to 88% (large PG). The ICRP model predicted 7%-18% alveolar delivery; 9%-19% venous delivery, mostly in the head; and 73%-80% losses by exhalation. Reference cigarettes generated more particles initially, but were otherwise similar; however, in vivo smoke particle deposition is higher than the model predicts.
CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine delivery may depend on vaping technique, particle evolution, and cloud effects. Predicted 10% arterial and 15% venous delivery may describe bystander exposure better than vapers exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23042984     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  65 in total

1.  Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Jan Czogala; Maciej L Goniewicz; Bartlomiej Fidelus; Wioleta Zielinska-Danch; Mark J Travers; Andrzej Sobczak
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Chronic E-Cigarette Use Increases Neutrophil Elastase and Matrix Metalloprotease Levels in the Lung.

Authors:  Arunava Ghosh; Raymond D Coakley; Andrew J Ghio; Marianne S Muhlebach; Charles R Esther; Neil E Alexis; Robert Tarran
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Electronic cigarettes: age-specific generation-resolved pulmonary doses.

Authors:  Maurizio Manigrasso; Giorgio Buonanno; Fernanda Carmen Fuoco; Luca Stabile; Pasquale Avino
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Chronic intermittent nicotine delivery via lung alveolar region-targeted aerosol technology produces circadian pharmacokinetics in rats resembling human smokers.

Authors:  Xuesi M Shao; Siyu Liu; Eon S Lee; David Fung; Hua Pei; Jing Liang; Ross Mudgway; Jingxi Zhang; Jack L Feldman; Yifang Zhu; Stan Louie; Xinmin S Xie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-09-20

5.  Real-Time Measurement of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Size Distribution and Metals Content Analysis.

Authors:  Vladimir B Mikheev; Marielle C Brinkman; Courtney A Granville; Sydney M Gordon; Pamela I Clark
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Hygroscopic Properties and Respiratory System Deposition Behavior of Particulate Matter Emitted By Mining and Smelting Operations.

Authors:  Jong-Sang Youn; Janae Csavina; Kyle P Rine; Taylor Shingler; Mark Patrick Taylor; A Eduardo Sáez; Eric A Betterton; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  The changing tobacco landscape: What dental professionals need to know.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Couch; Benjamin W Chaffee; Stuart A Gansky; Margaret M Walsh
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  A Real-Time Fast-Flow Tube Study of VOC and Particulate Emissions from Electronic, Potentially Reduced-Harm, Conventional, and Reference Cigarettes.

Authors:  Sandra L Blair; Scott A Epstein; Sergey A Nizkorodov; Norbert Staimer
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.908

9.  Development and characterization of electronic-cigarette exposure generation system (Ecig-EGS) for the physico-chemical and toxicological assessment of electronic cigarette emissions.

Authors:  Jiayuan Zhao; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 10.  Electronic cigarettes: what are they and what do they do?

Authors:  Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.