Literature DB >> 26726281

A Real-Time Fast-Flow Tube Study of VOC and Particulate Emissions from Electronic, Potentially Reduced-Harm, Conventional, and Reference Cigarettes.

Sandra L Blair1, Scott A Epstein1, Sergey A Nizkorodov1, Norbert Staimer2.   

Abstract

Tobacco-free electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), which are currently not regulated by the FDA, have become widespread as a "safe" form of smoking. One approach to evaluate the potential toxicity of e-cigarettes and other types of potentially "reduced-harm" cigarettes is to compare their emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including reactive organic electrophillic compounds such as acrolein, and particulate matter to those of conventional and reference cigarettes. Our newly designed fast-flow tube system enabled us to analyze VOC composition and particle number concentration in real-time by promptly diluting puffs of mainstream smoke obtained from different brands of combustion cigarettes and e-cigarettes. A proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTRMS) was used to analyze real-time cigarette VOC emissions with a 1 s time resolution. Particles were detected with a condensation particle counter (CPC). This technique offers real-time analysis of VOCs and particles in each puff without sample aging and does not require any sample pretreatment or extra handling. Several important determining factors in VOC and particle concentration were investigated: (1) puff frequency; (2) puff number; (3) tar content; (4) filter type. Results indicate that electronic cigarettes are not free from acrolein and acetaldehyde emissions and produce comparable particle number concentrations to those of combustion cigarettes, more specifically to the 1R5F reference cigarette. Unlike conventional cigarettes, which emit different amounts of particles and VOCs each puff, there was no significant puff dependence in the e-cigarette emissions. Charcoal filter cigarettes did not fully prevent the emission of acrolein and other VOCs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acrolein; cigarette; e-cigarette; mass spectrometry (MS); particle size measurement; volatile organic compounds (VOC)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26726281      PMCID: PMC4696598          DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2015.1076156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol        ISSN: 0278-6826            Impact factor:   2.908


  37 in total

1.  Analysis of cigarette smoke by an online thermal desorption system and multidimensional GC-MS.

Authors:  Yuichiro Takanami; Masahiro Chida; Hayato Hasebe; Yukio Sone; Shizuo Suhara
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.618

Review 2.  E-cigarette prevalence and correlates of use among adolescents versus adults: a review and comparison.

Authors:  Shawna L Carroll Chapman; Li-Tzy Wu
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  [Comparison of the aerosol produced by electronic cigarettes with conventional cigarettes and the shisha].

Authors:  J-F Bertholon; M H Becquemin; M Roy; F Roy; D Ledur; I Annesi Maesano; B Dautzenberg
Journal:  Rev Mal Respir       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 0.622

4.  Effect of smoking parameters on the particle size distribution and predicted airway deposition of mainstream cigarette smoke.

Authors:  David B Kane; Bahman Asgharian; Owen T Price; Ali Rostami; Michael J Oldham
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Aerosol deposition doses in the human respiratory tree of electronic cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Maurizio Manigrasso; Giorgio Buonanno; Fernanda Carmen Fuoco; Luca Stabile; Pasquale Avino
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Electronic cigarette aerosol particle size distribution measurements.

Authors:  Bradley J Ingebrethsen; Stephen K Cole; Steven L Alderman
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  In vitro particle size distributions in electronic and conventional cigarette aerosols suggest comparable deposition patterns.

Authors:  Yaping Zhang; Walton Sumner; Da-Ren Chen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Flavour chemicals in electronic cigarette fluids.

Authors:  Peyton A Tierney; Clarissa D Karpinski; Jessica E Brown; Wentai Luo; James F Pankow
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  New insights into the formation of volatile compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke.

Authors:  C Liu; S Feng; J van Heemst; K G McAdam
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  5 in total

1.  An online method for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in electronic cigarette aerosol based on proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kostiantyn Breiev; Kerstin M M Burseg; Grant O'Connell; Eugen Hartungen; Stefan S Biel; Xavier Cahours; Stéphane Colard; Tilmann D Märk; Philipp Sulzer
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Cross-Sectional Association of Lifetime Electronic Cigarette Use with Wheezing and Related Respiratory Symptoms in U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Dongmei Li; Zidian Xie
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Method Validation Approaches for Analysis of Constituents in ENDS.

Authors:  Samantha M Reilly; Tianrong Cheng; Jenna DuMond
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2020-07

Review 4.  Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Gene Gillman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure Decrease After Smokers Switch to an E-Cigarette or Nicotine Gum.

Authors:  Elaine K Round; Peter Chen; Anthony K Taylor; Eckhardt Schmidt
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.