Literature DB >> 23041438

Cationic agent contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of cartilage correlates with the compressive modulus and coefficient of friction.

B A Lakin1, D J Grasso, S S Shah, R C Stewart, P N Bansal, J D Freedman, M W Grinstaff, B D Snyder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) attenuation, using a cationic contrast agent (CA4+), correlates with the equilibrium compressive modulus (E) and coefficient of friction (μ) of ex vivo bovine articular cartilage.
METHODS: Correlations between CECT attenuation and E (Group 1, n = 12) and μ (Group 2, n = 10) were determined using 7 mm diameter bovine osteochondral plugs from the stifle joints of six freshly slaughtered, skeletally mature cows. The equilibrium compressive modulus was measured using a four-step, unconfined, compressive stress-relaxation test, and the coefficients of friction were determined from a torsional friction test. Following mechanical testing, samples were immersed in CA4+, imaged using μCT, rinsed, and analyzed for glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content using the 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay.
RESULTS: The CECT attenuation was positively correlated with the GAG content of bovine cartilage (R(2) = 0.87, P < 0.0001 for Group 1 and R(2) = 0.74, P = 0.001 for Group 2). Strong and significant positive correlations were observed between E and GAG content (R(2) = 0.90, P < 0.0001) as well as CECT attenuation and E (R(2) = 0.90, P < 0.0001). The CECT attenuation was negatively correlated with the three coefficients of friction: CECT vs μ(static) (R(2) = 0.71, P = 0.002), CECT vs μ(static_equilibrium) (R(2) = 0.79, P < 0.001), and CECT vs μ(kinetic) (R(2) = 0.69, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: CECT with CA4+ is a useful tool for determining the mechanical properties of ex vivo cartilage tissue as the attenuation significantly correlates with the compressive modulus and coefficient of friction.
Copyright © 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23041438      PMCID: PMC3878721          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  69 in total

Review 1.  Who gets osteoarthritis and why? An update.

Authors:  Eric L Radin
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 2.  Fell-Muir Lecture: Proteoglycans and more--from molecules to biology.

Authors:  Dick Heinegård
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Role of uppermost superficial surface layer of articular cartilage in the lubrication mechanism of joints.

Authors:  P Kumar; M Oka; J Toguchida; M Kobayashi; E Uchida; T Nakamura; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI.

Authors:  A Bashir; M L Gray; J Hartke; D Burstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Intrajoint comparisons of gene expression patterns in human osteoarthritis suggest a change in chondrocyte phenotype.

Authors:  Rieko Yagi; Denise McBurney; David Laverty; Scott Weiner; Walter E Horton
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  The pathobiology of focal lesion development in aging human articular cartilage and molecular matrix changes characteristic of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ginette R Squires; Sharon Okouneff; Mirela Ionescu; A Robin Poole
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-05

7.  Effect of contrast agent charge on visualization of articular cartilage using computed tomography: exploiting electrostatic interactions for improved sensitivity.

Authors:  Neel S Joshi; Prashant N Bansal; Rachel C Stewart; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 8.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects.

Authors:  E B Hunziker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: Relationships with tissue mechanical properties.

Authors:  E Lammentausta; P Kiviranta; M J Nissi; M S Laasanen; I Kiviranta; M T Nieminen; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Chemical composition and swelling of normal and osteoarthrotic femoral head cartilage. I. Chemical composition.

Authors:  M Venn; A Maroudas
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  18 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced CT using a cationic contrast agent enables non-destructive assessment of the biochemical and biomechanical properties of mouse tibial plateau cartilage.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lakin; Harsh Patel; Conor Holland; Jonathan D Freedman; Joshua S Shelofsky; Brian D Snyder; Kathryn S Stok; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Quantitative Evaluation of Equine Articular Cartilage Using Cationic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Brad B Nelson; Rachel C Stewart; Chris E Kawcak; Jonathan D Freedman; Amit N Patwa; Brian D Snyder; Laurie R Goodrich; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Synthesis and Preclinical Characterization of a Cationic Iodinated Imaging Contrast Agent (CA4+) and Its Use for Quantitative Computed Tomography of Ex Vivo Human Hip Cartilage.

Authors:  Rachel C Stewart; Amit N Patwa; Hrvoje Lusic; Jonathan D Freedman; Michel Wathier; Brian D Snyder; Ali Guermazi; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Tantalum oxide nanoparticles for the imaging of articular cartilage using X-ray computed tomography: visualization of ex vivo/in vivo murine tibia and ex vivo human index finger cartilage.

Authors:  Jonathan D Freedman; Hrvoje Lusic; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Contrast-enhanced CT facilitates rapid, non-destructive assessment of cartilage and bone properties of the human metacarpal.

Authors:  B A Lakin; D J Ellis; J S Shelofsky; J D Freedman; M W Grinstaff; B D Snyder
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  A synthetic polymeric biolubricant imparts chondroprotection in a rat meniscal tear model.

Authors:  Michel Wathier; Benjamin A Lakin; Benjamin G Cooper; Prashant N Bansal; Alison M Bendele; Vahid Entezari; Hideki Suzuki; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Reinforcement of articular cartilage with a tissue-interpenetrating polymer network reduces friction and modulates interstitial fluid load support.

Authors:  B G Cooper; T B Lawson; B D Snyder; M W Grinstaff
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  A Synthetic Bottle-brush Polyelectrolyte Reduces Friction and Wear of Intact and Previously Worn Cartilage.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lakin; Benjamin G Cooper; Luai Zakaria; Daniel J Grasso; Michel Wathier; Alison M Bendele; Jonathan D Freedman; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-05-17

9.  Contrast enhanced CT attenuation correlates with the GAG content of bovine meniscus.

Authors:  Bejamin A Lakin; Daniel J Grasso; Rachel C Stewart; Jonathan D Freedman; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  A cationic gadolinium contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage.

Authors:  Jonathan D Freedman; Hrvoje Lusic; Martin Wiewiorski; Michelle Farley; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.