Literature DB >> 33722083

Quantitative Evaluation of Equine Articular Cartilage Using Cationic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Brad B Nelson1, Rachel C Stewart2, Chris E Kawcak1, Jonathan D Freedman3, Amit N Patwa4, Brian D Snyder5, Laurie R Goodrich1, Mark W Grinstaff6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diffusion trajectory of a cationic contrast medium (CA4+) into equine articular cartilage, and to assess normal and degenerative equine articular cartilage using cationic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).
DESIGN: In the first experiment (Exp1), equine osteochondral specimens were serially imaged with cationic CECT to establish the diffusion time constant and time to reach equilibrium in healthy articular cartilage. In a separate experiment (Exp2), articular cartilage defects were created on the femoral trochlea (defect joint) in a juvenile horse, while the opposite joint was a sham-operated control. After 7 weeks, osteochondral biopsies were collected throughout the articular surfaces of both joints. Biopsies were analyzed for cationic CECT attenuation, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, mechanical stiffness (Eeq), and histology. Imaging, biochemical and mechanical data were compared between defect and control joints.
RESULTS: Exp1: The mean diffusion time constant was longer for medial condyle cartilage (3.05 ± 0.1 hours) than lateral condyle cartilage (1.54 ± 0.3 hours, P = 0.04). Exp2: Cationic CECT attenuation was lower in the defect joint than the control joint (P = 0.005) and also varied by anatomic location (P = 0.045). Mean cationic CECT attenuation from the lateral trochlear ridge was lower in the defect joint than in the control joint (2223 ± 329 HU and 2667 ± 540 HU, respectively; P = 0.02). Cationic CECT attenuation was strongly correlated with both GAG (ρ = 0.79, P < 0.0001) and Eeq (ρ = 0.61, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The equilibration time of CA4+ into equine articular cartilage is affected by tissue volume. Quantitative cationic CECT imaging reflects the biochemical, biomechanical and histological state of normal and degenerative equine articular cartilage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography arthrography (CTa); contrast agent; horse; imaging; osteoarthritis

Year:  2018        PMID: 33722083      PMCID: PMC7970376          DOI: 10.1177/1947603518812562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   4.634


  59 in total

1.  Synthesis and Preclinical Characterization of a Cationic Iodinated Imaging Contrast Agent (CA4+) and Its Use for Quantitative Computed Tomography of Ex Vivo Human Hip Cartilage.

Authors:  Rachel C Stewart; Amit N Patwa; Hrvoje Lusic; Jonathan D Freedman; Michel Wathier; Brian D Snyder; Ali Guermazi; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  A rabbit model demonstrates the influence of cartilage thickness on intra-articular drug delivery and retention within cartilage.

Authors:  Ambika G Bajpayee; Maximiliano Scheu; Alan J Grodzinsky; Ryan M Porter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Comparison of biomechanical and biochemical properties of cartilage from human knee and ankle pairs.

Authors:  S Treppo; H Koepp; E C Quan; A A Cole; K E Kuettner; A J Grodzinsky
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Contribution of proteoglycan osmotic swelling pressure to the compressive properties of articular cartilage.

Authors:  EunHee Han; Silvia S Chen; Stephen M Klisch; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Synovial fluid osmolality in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S Shanfield; P Campbell; M Baumgarten; R Bloebaum; A Sarmiento
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Dermal inorganic gadolinium concentrations: evidence for in vivo transmetallation and long-term persistence in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Authors:  J L Abraham; C Thakral; L Skov; K Rossen; P Marckmann
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 7.  Companion animals: Translational scientist's new best friends.

Authors:  Amir Kol; Boaz Arzi; Kyriacos A Athanasiou; Diana L Farmer; Jan A Nolta; Robert B Rebhun; Xinbin Chen; Leigh G Griffiths; Frank J M Verstraete; Christopher J Murphy; Dori L Borjesson
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 8.  Recent advances in articular cartilage evaluation using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B B Nelson; C E Kawcak; M F Barrett; C W McIlwraith; M W Grinstaff; L R Goodrich
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro.

Authors:  Tuomo S Silvast; Jukka S Jurvelin; Virpi Tiitu; Thomas M Quinn; Juha Töyräs
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  The role of changes in extracellular matrix of cartilage in the presence of inflammation on the pathology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Maricela Maldonado; Jin Nam
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contrast-Enhanced Micro-Computed Tomography for 3D Visualization and Quantification of Glycosaminoglycans in Different Cartilage Types.

Authors:  Manuela A Boos; Mark W Grinstaff; Shireen R Lamandé; Kathryn S Stok
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.117

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.