Literature DB >> 23039663

Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology in the U.S.: advisory data sets and possible initial values for U.S. reference levels.

Donald L Miller1, C Michael Hilohi, David C Spelic.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine patient radiation doses from interventional cardiology procedures in the U.S and to suggest possible initial values for U.S. benchmarks for patient radiation dose from selected interventional cardiology procedures [fluoroscopically guided diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)].
METHODS: Patient radiation dose metrics were derived from analysis of data from the 2008 to 2009 Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT) survey of cardiac catheterization. This analysis used identified data and did not require review by an IRB. Data from 171 facilities in 30 states were analyzed. The distributions (percentiles) of radiation dose metrics were determined for diagnostic cardiac catheterizations, PCI, and combined diagnostic and PCI procedures. Confidence intervals for these dose distributions were determined using bootstrap resampling.
RESULTS: Percentile distributions (advisory data sets) and possible preliminary U.S. reference levels (based on the 75th percentile of the dose distributions) are provided for cumulative air kerma at the reference point (K(a,r)), cumulative air kerma-area product (P(KA)), fluoroscopy time, and number of cine runs. Dose distributions are sufficiently detailed to permit dose audits as described in National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 168. Fluoroscopy times are consistent with those observed in European studies, but P(KA) is higher in the U.S.
CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient data exist to suggest possible initial benchmarks for patient radiation dose for certain interventional cardiology procedures in the U.S. Our data suggest that patient radiation dose in these procedures is not optimized in U.S. practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039663     DOI: 10.1118/1.4754300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic wire navigation with the conventional wire technique for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Christian Roth; Rudolf Berger; Sabine Scherzer; Lisa Krenn; Clemens Gangl; Daniel Dalos; Georg Delle-Karth; Thomas Neunteufl
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Radiation doses during cardiac catheterisation procedures in India: a multicentre study: Radiation dose study.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Subban; Sophie Amelot; Suma M Victor; Anil Potdar; Vishawanath Yadav; Tejas Patel; Sanjay Shah; Thomas Alexander; Balakumaran Jeyakumaran; Juno Angel; Mullasari S Ajit
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Michael M McNally; Salvatore T Scali; Robert J Feezor; Daniel Neal; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Beverley Osei; Lu Xu; Amanda Johnston; Sara Darko; Johnson Darko; Ernest Osei
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's role in improving radiation dose management for medical X-ray imaging devices.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Smita Kakar; Lu Jiang; David C Spelic; Laurel Burk
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

6.  Establishing a diagnostic reference level of radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Vikas Kataria; Ishita Yaduvanshi; Gautam Singal; Mohan Nair
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2021-09-21

7.  Primary operator radiation dose in the cardiac catheter laboratory.

Authors:  James A Crowhurst; Mark Whitby; Nicholas Aroney; Rustem Dautov; Darren Walters; Owen Raffel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: initial results from the establishment of a multi-centre diagnostic reference level in Queensland public hospitals.

Authors:  James A Crowhurst; Mark Whitby; David Thiele; Toni Halligan; Adam Westerink; Suzanne Crown; Jillian Milne
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-04

9.  Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography.

Authors:  T Ten Cate; M van Wely; H Gehlmann; M Mauti; C Camaro; N Reifart; H Suryapranata; M J de Boer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.380

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.