Literature DB >> 23039661

Application of Zernike polynomials towards accelerated adaptive focusing of transcranial high intensity focused ultrasound.

Elena A Kaye1, Yoni Hertzberg, Michael Marx, Beat Werner, Gil Navon, Marc Levoy, Kim Butts Pauly.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the phase aberrations produced by human skulls during transcranial magnetic resonance imaging guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS), to demonstrate the potential of Zernike polynomials (ZPs) to accelerate the adaptive focusing process, and to investigate the benefits of using phase corrections obtained in previous studies to provide the initial guess for correction of a new data set.
METHODS: The five phase aberration data sets, analyzed here, were calculated based on preoperative computerized tomography (CT) images of the head obtained during previous transcranial MRgFUS treatments performed using a clinical prototype hemispherical transducer. The noniterative adaptive focusing algorithm [Larrat et al., "MR-guided adaptive focusing of ultrasound," IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57(8), 1734-1747 (2010)] was modified by replacing Hadamard encoding with Zernike encoding. The algorithm was tested in simulations to correct the patients' phase aberrations. MR acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) was used to visualize the effect of the phase aberration correction on the focusing of a hemispherical transducer. In addition, two methods for constructing initial phase correction estimate based on previous patient's data were investigated. The benefits of the initial estimates in the Zernike-based algorithm were analyzed by measuring their effect on the ultrasound intensity at the focus and on the number of ZP modes necessary to achieve 90% of the intensity of the nonaberrated case.
RESULTS: Covariance of the pairs of the phase aberrations data sets showed high correlation between aberration data of several patients and suggested that subgroups can be based on level of correlation. Simulation of the Zernike-based algorithm demonstrated the overall greater correction effectiveness of the low modes of ZPs. The focal intensity achieves 90% of nonaberrated intensity using fewer than 170 modes of ZPs. The initial estimates based on using the average of the phase aberration data from the individual subgroups of subjects was shown to increase the intensity at the focal spot for the five subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of ZPs to phase aberration correction was shown to be beneficial for adaptive focusing of transcranial ultrasound. The skull-based phase aberrations were found to be well approximated by the number of ZP modes representing only a fraction of the number of elements in the hemispherical transducer. Implementing the initial phase aberration estimate together with Zernike-based algorithm can be used to improve the robustness and can potentially greatly increase the viability of MR-ARFI-based focusing for a clinical transcranial MRgFUS therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039661      PMCID: PMC3470612          DOI: 10.1118/1.4752085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics.

Authors:  A P Sarvazyan; O V Rudenko; S D Swanson; J B Fowlkes; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Correlation of ultrasound phase with physical skull properties.

Authors:  G T Clement; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans.

Authors:  J F Aubry; M Tanter; M Pernot; J L Thomas; M Fink
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Ultrasound focusing using magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging: application to ultrasound transcranial therapy.

Authors:  Y Hertzberg; A Volovick; Y Zur; Y Medan; S Vitek; G Navon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  MR-guided adaptive focusing of ultrasound.

Authors:  Benoît Larrat; Mathieu Pernot; Gabriel Montaldo; Mathias Fink; Mickaël Tanter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Focusing of therapeutic ultrasound through a human skull: a numerical study.

Authors:  J Sun; K Hynynen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Rapid MR-ARFI method for focal spot localization during focused ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Elena A Kaye; Jing Chen; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging- guided focused ultrasound surgery of brain tumors: initial findings in 3 patients.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Greg T Clement; Peter Black; Ferenc Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  The safety and feasibility of extracorporeal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of liver and kidney tumours in a Western population.

Authors:  R O Illing; J E Kennedy; F Wu; G R ter Haar; A S Protheroe; P J Friend; F V Gleeson; D W Cranston; R R Phillips; M R Middleton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of analytical and numerical approaches for CT-based aberration correction in transcranial passive acoustic imaging.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Predicting variation in subject thermal response during transcranial magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery: Comparison in seventeen subject datasets.

Authors:  Urvi Vyas; Pejman Ghanouni; Casey H Halpern; Jeff Elias; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Simultaneous MR thermometry and acoustic radiation force imaging using interleaved acquisition.

Authors:  Joshua T de Bever; Henrik Odéen; Lorne W Hofstetter; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  A Tikhonov Regularization Scheme for Focus Rotations With Focused Ultrasound-Phased Arrays.

Authors:  Alec Hughes; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Phase-Aberration Correction for HIFU Therapy Using a Multielement Array and Backscattering of Nonlinear Pulses.

Authors:  Gilles P L Thomas; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Christopher R Bawiec; Alex T Peek; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Matthew O'Donnell; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Two-step aberration correction: application to transcranial histotripsy.

Authors:  Ning Lu; Timothy L Hall; Jonathan R Sukovich; Sang Won Choi; John Snell; Nathan McDannold; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Transcranial phase aberration correction using beam simulations and MR-ARFI.

Authors:  Urvi Vyas; Elena Kaye; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Treatment envelope evaluation in transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound utilizing 3D MR thermometry.

Authors:  Henrik Odéen; Joshua de Bever; Scott Almquist; Alexis Farrer; Nick Todd; Allison Payne; John W Snell; Douglas A Christensen; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2014-10-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.