PURPOSE: Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery is a noninvasive technique for causing selective tissue necrosis. Variations in density, thickness, and shape of the skull cause aberrations in the location and shape of the focal zone. In this paper, the authors propose a hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique to achieve aberration correction for transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery. The technique uses ultrasound beam propagation simulations with MR Acoustic Radiation Force Imaging (MR-ARFI) to correct skull-caused phase aberrations. METHODS: Skull-based numerical aberrations were obtained from a MR-guided focused ultrasound patient treatment and were added to all elements of the InSightec conformal bone focused ultrasound surgery transducer during transmission. In the first experiment, the 1024 aberrations derived from a human skull were condensed into 16 aberrations by averaging over the transducer area of 64 elements. In the second experiment, all 1024 aberrations were applied to the transducer. The aberrated MR-ARFI images were used in the hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique to find 16 estimated aberrations. These estimated aberrations were subtracted from the original aberrations to result in the corrected images. Each aberration experiment (16-aberration and 1024-aberration) was repeated three times. RESULTS: The corrected MR-ARFI image was compared to the aberrated image and the ideal image (image with zero aberrations) for each experiment. The hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique resulted in an average increase in focal MR-ARFI phase of 44% for the 16-aberration case and 52% for the 1024-aberration case, and recovered 83% and 39% of the ideal MR-ARFI phase for the 16-aberrations and 1024-aberration case, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using one MR-ARFI image and noa priori information about the applied phase aberrations, the hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique improved the maximum MR-ARFI phase of the beam's focus.
PURPOSE: Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery is a noninvasive technique for causing selective tissue necrosis. Variations in density, thickness, and shape of the skull cause aberrations in the location and shape of the focal zone. In this paper, the authors propose a hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique to achieve aberration correction for transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery. The technique uses ultrasound beam propagation simulations with MR Acoustic Radiation Force Imaging (MR-ARFI) to correct skull-caused phase aberrations. METHODS: Skull-based numerical aberrations were obtained from a MR-guided focused ultrasound patient treatment and were added to all elements of the InSightec conformal bone focused ultrasound surgery transducer during transmission. In the first experiment, the 1024 aberrations derived from a human skull were condensed into 16 aberrations by averaging over the transducer area of 64 elements. In the second experiment, all 1024 aberrations were applied to the transducer. The aberrated MR-ARFI images were used in the hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique to find 16 estimated aberrations. These estimated aberrations were subtracted from the original aberrations to result in the corrected images. Each aberration experiment (16-aberration and 1024-aberration) was repeated three times. RESULTS: The corrected MR-ARFI image was compared to the aberrated image and the ideal image (image with zero aberrations) for each experiment. The hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique resulted in an average increase in focal MR-ARFI phase of 44% for the 16-aberration case and 52% for the 1024-aberration case, and recovered 83% and 39% of the ideal MR-ARFI phase for the 16-aberrations and 1024-aberration case, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using one MR-ARFI image and noa priori information about the applied phase aberrations, the hybrid simulation-MR-ARFI technique improved the maximum MR-ARFI phase of the beam's focus.
Authors: Mark L Palmeri; Amy C Sharma; Richard R Bouchard; Roger W Nightingale; Kathryn R Nightingale Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Stephen Monteith; Jason Sheehan; Ricky Medel; Max Wintermark; Matthew Eames; John Snell; Neal F Kassell; W Jeff Elias Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2012-11-23 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: W Jeffrey Elias; Diane Huss; Tiffini Voss; Johanna Loomba; Mohamad Khaled; Eyal Zadicario; Robert C Frysinger; Scott A Sperling; Scott Wylie; Stephen J Monteith; Jason Druzgal; Binit B Shah; Madaline Harrison; Max Wintermark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Allison Payne; Josh de Bever; Alexis Farrer; Brittany Coats; Dennis L Parker; Douglas A Christensen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Pooja Gaur; Kerriann M Casey; Jan Kubanek; Ningrui Li; Morteza Mohammadjavadi; Yamil Saenz; Gary H Glover; Donna M Bouley; Kim Butts Pauly Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Andrew S Mikhail; Ari Partanen; Pavel Yarmolenko; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Bradford J Wood Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 2.266