Literature DB >> 23039208

Nodal involvement at nephrectomy is associated with worse survival: a stage-for-stage and grade-for-grade analysis.

Maxine Sun1, Marco Bianchi, Jens Hansen, Firas Abdollah, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Giovanni Lughezzani, Shahrokh F Shariat, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine cancer-specific mortality in patients with nodal metastases relative to patients without nodal involvement at nephrectomy for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a population-based cohort.
METHODS: A total of 11 374 non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent a lymph node dissection at nephrectomy were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (1988-2008). The 5-year cancer-specific mortality-free survival rates were examined according to the presence or absence of nodal involvement within the entire cohort, and stratified according to pathological tumor stage (pT1 vs pT2 vs pT3 vs pT4) and Fuhrman grade (I vs II vs III vs IV). Cox regression analyses for prediction of cancer-specific mortality were modeled to assess the effect of nodal metastases versus no nodal involvement in the entire population. Finally, separate Cox regression models were fitted within each pathological stage and grade.
RESULTS: Overall, 1260 (11%) patients had nodal metastases at nephrectomy. The overall 5-year cancer-specific mortality-free survival rates were 38.4 versus 83.8% in patients with nodal metastases and without nodal metastases, respectively. In multivariable analyses, amongst pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4, patients with nodal metastases were 6.0-, 3.6-, 3.2- and 2.0-fold, respectively, more likely to die after nephrectomy (all P < 0.001). Similarly, amongst Fuhrman grade I, Fuhrman grade II, Fuhrman grade III and Fuhrman grade IV, patients with nodal metastases were 3.9-, 3.5-, 3.1- and 2.7-fold, respectively, more likely to die of cancer-specific mortality (all P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Nodal involvement is an important determinant of higher cancer-specific mortality after nephrectomy. The detrimental effect of nodal metastases is particularly strong amongst patients with low-stage or low-grade non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
© 2012 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039208     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03170.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of survival outcomes in patients with metastatic papillary vs. clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-score analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rosiello; Carlotta Palumbo; Sophie Knipper; Angela Pecoraro; Stefano Luzzago; Pierre-Antoine St-Hilaire; Zhe Tian; Umberto Capitanio; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  The contemporary role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Paul Russo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-08-20

3.  Prognosticators and outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma and adjacent organ invasion treated with radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Leonardo D Borregales; Dae Y Kim; Angie L Staller; Wei Qiao; Arun Z Thomas; Mehrad Adibi; Pheroze Tamboli; Kanishka Sircar; Eric Jonasch; Nizar M Tannir; Surena F Matin; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  Prognostic Factors for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Their Application in Adjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Kalle E Mattila; Paula Vainio; Panu M Jaakkola
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Radiologic Node-positive Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Absence of Distant Metastases: A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy and Lymph Node Dissection.

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Reassessment of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Stage III Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nodal Involvement: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of a Large Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jianglong Han; Qin Li; Ping Li; Shijie Wang; Rui Zhang; Yunfeng Qiao; Qibin Song; Zhenming Fu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Association of Tumor Size with Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Yunlai Zhi; Xiao Li; Feng Qi; Xin Hu; Wenbo Xu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 4.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.