OBJECTIVES: Florida has the second highest incidence of melanoma in the United States, and more than 600 Floridians die from melanoma annually. Given the lack of population-based data on skin cancer screening among the different US geographic regions, we compared skin cancer screening rates among Floridians to those in the rest of the South, the Northeast, the Midwest, and the West. METHODS: We used data from the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Data were grouped according to whether participants reported ever receiving a skin cancer examination in their lifetime. Data were pooled, and analyses accounted for sample weights and design effects. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed with self-reported skin screening as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Results showed that compared to the rest of the US, Floridians who were women 70 years old and older, reported being of "other" race, of non-Hispanic ethnicity, having a high school education, having health insurance, and employed in the service industry or unemployed, had significantly higher lifetime skin cancer screening rates than their subgroup counterparts residing in the other regions. Multivariable logistic regression showed that Floridians remained significantly more likely to have ever been screened for skin cancer compared to the other US regions after controlling for a variety of sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing melanoma detection remains a national cancer goal for the US, and future identification of underlying causal factors for higher screening rates in Florida could inform intervention strategies in the other US regions.
OBJECTIVES: Florida has the second highest incidence of melanoma in the United States, and more than 600 Floridians die from melanoma annually. Given the lack of population-based data on skin cancer screening among the different US geographic regions, we compared skin cancer screening rates among Floridians to those in the rest of the South, the Northeast, the Midwest, and the West. METHODS: We used data from the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Data were grouped according to whether participants reported ever receiving a skin cancer examination in their lifetime. Data were pooled, and analyses accounted for sample weights and design effects. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed with self-reported skin screening as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Results showed that compared to the rest of the US, Floridians who were women 70 years old and older, reported being of "other" race, of non-Hispanic ethnicity, having a high school education, having health insurance, and employed in the service industry or unemployed, had significantly higher lifetime skin cancer screening rates than their subgroup counterparts residing in the other regions. Multivariable logistic regression showed that Floridians remained significantly more likely to have ever been screened for skin cancer compared to the other US regions after controlling for a variety of sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing melanoma detection remains a national cancer goal for the US, and future identification of underlying causal factors for higher screening rates in Florida could inform intervention strategies in the other US regions.
Authors: Cristina A Fernandez; Laura A McClure; William G LeBlanc; Tainya C Clarke; Robert S Kirsner; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2012-03
Authors: William G LeBlanc; Liat Vidal; Robert S Kirsner; David J Lee; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Kathryn E McCollister; Kristopher L Arheart; Katherine Chung-Bridges; Sharon Christ; John Clark; John E Lewis; Evelyn P Davila; Panta Rouhani; Lora E Fleming Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2008-04-24 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Alexander Katalinic; Annika Waldmann; Martin A Weinstock; Alan C Geller; Nora Eisemann; Ruediger Greinert; Beate Volkmer; Eckhard Breitbart Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: L A Goldsmith; H K Koh; B A Bewerse; B Reilley; S W Wyatt; W F Bergfeld; A C Geller; P F Walters Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Matthew S Goldberg; John T Doucette; Henry W Lim; James Spencer; John A Carucci; Darrell S Rigel Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Mona Saraiya; H Irene Hall; Trevor Thompson; Anne Hartman; Karen Glanz; Barbara Rimer; Deborah Rose Journal: Prev Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: A Waldmann; S Nolte; M A Weinstock; E W Breitbart; N Eisemann; A C Geller; R Greinert; B Volkmer; A Katalinic Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Rekha Reddy; Liya Davidova; Indraneel Bhattacharyya; Donald M Cohen; Mohammed N Islam; Sarah G Fitzpatrick Journal: Head Neck Pathol Date: 2018-01-16