Literature DB >> 8847720

Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination.

M Berwick1, C B Begg, J A Fine, G C Roush, R L Barnhill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although some evidence indicates that early detection protects against the development of lethal melanoma, no randomized clinical trials have been conducted to measure the efficacy of early detection (or screening) in preventing death from this disease. Since melanoma incidence in the United States is relatively rare, a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of screening would be extremely expensive.
PURPOSE: As an alternative to a randomized clinical trial, we conducted a population-based, case-control study to investigate whether early detection through skin self-examination (SSE) is associated with a decreased risk of lethal melanoma (includes the presence of advanced disease with distant metastases in addition to death from melanoma).
METHODS: SSE (conducting a careful, deliberate, and purposeful examination of the skin) was assessed in all subjects by use of a structured questionnaire and personal interviews. The major exposure variable, SSE, was defined following focus-group interviews with melanoma patients and healthy control subjects. The final study population consisted of 1199 Caucasian residents of the state of Connecticut enrolled from January 15, 1987, through May 15, 1989; 650 individuals were newly diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma, and the remaining 549 individuals were age- and sex-frequency matched control subjects from the general population. During the study interviews, nevi on the arms and backs of subjects were counted. In 5 years of follow-up (through March 1994), 110 lethal cases of melanoma were identified. The study design allowed separate estimation of the impact of SSE on reduced melanoma incidence (primary prevention) and survival among incident cases (secondary prevention). Odds ratios (ORs) were used to measure the associations between SSE and melanoma and between SSE and lethal melanoma.
RESULTS: SSE, practiced by only 15% of all subjects, was associated with a reduced risk of melanoma incidence (adjusted OR = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.99; comparing case patients with control subjects). The data indicated further that SSE may reduce the risk of advanced disease among melanoma patients (unadjusted risk ratio = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.31-1.11); however, longer follow-up is required to confirm this latter estimate. If both estimates are correct, they suggest, in combination, that SSE may reduce mortality from melanoma by 63% (adjusted OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.16-0.84; comparing lethal cases with general population controls). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: SSE may provide a useful and inexpensive screening method to reduce the incidence of melanoma. SSE may also reduce the development of advanced disease. The results of this study need to be replicated before strategies to increase the practice of SSE are further developed and promoted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8847720     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  90 in total

1.  Epidemiological aspects of cancer screening in Germany.

Authors:  Nikolaus Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Skin cancer prevention practices among malignant melanoma survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vinayak K Nahar; M Allison Ford; Robert T Brodell; Javier F Boyas; Stephanie K Jacks; Rizwana Biviji-Sharma; Mary A Haskins; Martha A Bass
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Melanoma: is more diagnosis better?

Authors:  Marianne Berwick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Common susceptibility genes for cancer: search for the end of the rainbow.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-13

Review 5.  Strategies for early melanoma detection: Approaches to the patient with nevi.

Authors:  Agnessa Gadeliya Goodson; Douglas Grossman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Comparison of Florida skin cancer screening rates with those in different US regions.

Authors:  Cristina A Fernandez; Laura A McClure; William G Leblanc; Tainya C Clarke; Robert S Kirsner; Lora E Fleming; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 7.  Screening and early detection of skin cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Linden
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Perceived intrafamily melanoma risk communication.

Authors:  Lois J Loescher; Janice D Crist; Leilani A C L Siaki
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Sun protection and skin self-examination in melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Urvi J Mujumdar; Jennifer L Hay; Yvette C Monroe-Hinds; Amanda J Hummer; Colin B Begg; Homer B Wilcox; Susan A Oliveria; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Screening and prevention measures for melanoma: is there a survival advantage?

Authors:  Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Suephy C Chen; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.