BACKGROUND: Since its inception in 1985, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program has strived to enhance early detection of cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM) by providing nationwide skin cancer education campaigns in combination with free skin cancer screenings. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the AAD screening data from 2001 to 2005 in order to identify factors associated with MM detection, and thereby derive a model of increased likelihood for MM detection through visual skin examinations at screenings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed a standardized AAD pre-screening form with historical and phenotypic information. Clinicians then recorded suspected clinical findings noted at visual skin examination. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill). RESULTS: Five factors, which can be remembered with the acronym HARMM, independently increased the likelihood of suspected MM being found in the 362,804 persons screened: History of previous melanoma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-3.8); Age over 50 (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3); Regular dermatologist absent (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5); Mole changing (OR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.9-2.2); and Male gender (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5). Individuals at highest risk (4 or 5 factors) comprised only 5.8% of the total population, yet accounted for 13.6% of presumptive MM findings, and were 4.4 times (95% CI, 3.8-5.1) more likely to be diagnosed with suspected MM than individuals at lowest risk (0 or 1 factor). Receipt of a total skin examination at screening independently increased the likelihood for identifying suspected MM (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6). However, significantly fewer screenees in the highest risk group versus those in the lowest risk group underwent total skin examinations (53.7% vs 62.5%). LIMITATIONS: Risk factors studied limited to variables collected in screenee enrollment form. CONCLUSIONS: A higher-risk subgroup of the skin cancer screening population can be identified through assessment of MM risk factors using the HARMM criteria. Refocusing efforts to provide a total skin examination to those individuals with multiple risk factors has the potential to both reduce costs and increase yields for suspected MM in future mass screening initiatives.
BACKGROUND: Since its inception in 1985, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program has strived to enhance early detection of cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM) by providing nationwide skin cancer education campaigns in combination with free skin cancer screenings. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the AAD screening data from 2001 to 2005 in order to identify factors associated with MM detection, and thereby derive a model of increased likelihood for MM detection through visual skin examinations at screenings. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients completed a standardized AAD pre-screening form with historical and phenotypic information. Clinicians then recorded suspected clinical findings noted at visual skin examination. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill). RESULTS: Five factors, which can be remembered with the acronym HARMM, independently increased the likelihood of suspected MM being found in the 362,804 persons screened: History of previous melanoma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-3.8); Age over 50 (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3); Regular dermatologist absent (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5); Mole changing (OR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.9-2.2); and Male gender (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5). Individuals at highest risk (4 or 5 factors) comprised only 5.8% of the total population, yet accounted for 13.6% of presumptive MM findings, and were 4.4 times (95% CI, 3.8-5.1) more likely to be diagnosed with suspected MM than individuals at lowest risk (0 or 1 factor). Receipt of a total skin examination at screening independently increased the likelihood for identifying suspected MM (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6). However, significantly fewer screenees in the highest risk group versus those in the lowest risk group underwent total skin examinations (53.7% vs 62.5%). LIMITATIONS: Risk factors studied limited to variables collected in screenee enrollment form. CONCLUSIONS: A higher-risk subgroup of the skin cancer screening population can be identified through assessment of MM risk factors using the HARMM criteria. Refocusing efforts to provide a total skin examination to those individuals with multiple risk factors has the potential to both reduce costs and increase yields for suspected MM in future mass screening initiatives.
Authors: D Bonucchi; J Piattoni; F Ravera; A M Savazzi; G Cappelli; N Pimpinelli; P A Modesti Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: William G LeBlanc; Liat Vidal; Robert S Kirsner; David J Lee; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Kathryn E McCollister; Kristopher L Arheart; Katherine Chung-Bridges; Sharon Christ; John Clark; John E Lewis; Evelyn P Davila; Panta Rouhani; Lora E Fleming Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2008-04-24 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Bridget Grahmann Parsons; Lisa H Gren; Sara E Simonsen; Garrett Harding; Douglas Grossman; Yelena P Wu Journal: J Community Health Date: 2018-04
Authors: Cristina A Fernandez; Laura A McClure; William G Leblanc; Tainya C Clarke; Robert S Kirsner; Lora E Fleming; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee Journal: South Med J Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Melanie A Warycha; Paul J Christos; Madhu Mazumdar; Farbod Darvishian; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Anna C Pavlick; Alfred W Kopf; David Polsky; Iman Osman Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860