Literature DB >> 23036149

A multi-faceted tailored strategy to implement an electronic clinical decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention in nursing homes: a two-armed randomized controlled trial.

Dimitri Beeckman1, Els Clays, Ann Van Hecke, Katrien Vanderwee, Lisette Schoonhoven, Sofie Verhaeghe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frail older people admitted to nursing homes are at risk of a range of adverse outcomes, including pressure ulcers. Clinical decision support systems are believed to have the potential to improve care and to change the behaviour of healthcare professionals.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a multi-faceted tailored strategy to implement an electronic clinical decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention improves adherence to recommendations for pressure ulcer prevention in nursing homes.
DESIGN: Two-armed randomized controlled trial in a nursing home setting in Belgium. The trial consisted of a 16-week implementation intervention between February and June 2010, including one baseline, four intermediate, and one post-testing measurement. Primary outcome was the adherence to guideline-based care recommendations (in terms of allocating adequate pressure ulcer prevention in residents at risk). Secondary outcomes were the change in resident outcomes (pressure ulcer prevalence) and intermediate outcomes (knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals).
SETTING: Random sample of 11 wards (6 experimental; 5 control) in a convenience sample of 4 nursing homes in Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 464 nursing home residents and 118 healthcare professionals participated.
METHODS: The experimental arm was involved in a multi-faceted tailored implementation intervention of a clinical decision support system, including interactive education, reminders, monitoring, feedback and leadership. The control arm received a hard-copy of the pressure ulcer prevention protocol, supported by standardized 30 min group lecture.
RESULTS: Patients in the intervention arm were significantly more likely to receive fully adequate pressure ulcer prevention when seated in a chair (F=16.4, P=0.003). No significant improvement was observed on pressure ulcer prevalence and knowledge of the professionals. While baseline attitude scores were comparable between both groups [exp. 74.3% vs. contr. 74.5% (P=0.92)], the mean score after the intervention was 83.5% in the experimental group vs. 72.1% in the control group (F=15.12, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The intervention was only partially successful to improve the primary outcome. Attitudes improved significantly while the knowledge of the healthcare workers remained unsatisfactorily low. Further research should focus on the underlying reasons for these findings.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23036149     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  23 in total

1.  Getting evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention into practice: a multi-faceted unit-tailored intervention in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Eva Sving; Marieann Högman; Anna-Greta Mamhidir; Lena Gunningberg
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Clare Gillies; Elizabeth J Shaw; Francine Cheater; Signe Flottorp; Noelle Robertson; Michel Wensing; Michelle Fiander; Martin P Eccles; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Jan van Lieshout; Cornelia Jäger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-29

3.  Education and process change to improve skin health in a residential aged care facility.

Authors:  Kay Price; Kate J Kennedy; Tabatha L Rando; Anthony R Dyer; Jo Boylan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Understanding the Hawthorne effect in wound research-A scoping review.

Authors:  Van Nb Nguyen; Charne Miller; Janine Sunderland; William McGuiness
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the APuP instrument.

Authors:  Jan Florin; Carina Bååth; Lena Gunningberg; Gunilla Mårtensson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  A 2014 medical informatics perspective on clinical decision support systems: do we hit the ceiling of effectiveness?

Authors:  J Bouaud; J-B Lamy
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

7.  The use of health information technology to improve care and outcomes for older adults.

Authors:  Kathryn H Bowles; Patricia Dykes; George Demiris
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.571

8.  Pressure ulcer Cat. II-IV incidence on the CuroCell S.A.M. PRO powered reactive air support surface in a high-risk population: A multicentre cohort study in 12 Belgian nursing homes.

Authors:  Elien Zwaenepoel; Ann Van Hecke; Bénédicte Manderlier; Sofie Verhaeghe; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Medical device-related pressure ulcer (MDRPU) in acute care hospitals and its perceived importance and prevention performance by clinical nurses.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Kim; Yun Jin Lee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  Advancing health information technology roadmaps in long term care.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander; Andrew Georgiou; Kevin Doughty; Andrew Hornblow; Anne Livingstone; Michelle Dougherty; Stephen Jacobs; Malcolm J Fisk
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.