Literature DB >> 25124833

Attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the APuP instrument.

Jan Florin1, Carina Bååth2,3, Lena Gunningberg4, Gunilla Mårtensson4,5.   

Abstract

The primary aim was to conduct a psychometric evaluation of the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention (APuP) instrument in a Swedish context. A further aim was to describe and compare attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention between registered nurses (RNs), assistant nurses (ANs) and student nurses (SNs). In total, 415 RNs, ANs and SNs responded to the questionnaire. In addition to descriptive and comparative statistics, confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Because of a lack of support for the instrument structure, further explorative and consecutive confirmatory tests were conducted. Overall, positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention were identified for all three groups, but SNs reported lower attitude scores on three items and a higher score on one item compared to RNs and ANs. The findings indicated no support in this Swedish sample for the previously reported five-factor model of APuP. Further explorative and confirmative factor analyses indicated that a four-factor model was most interpretable: (i) Priority (five items), (ii) Competence (three items), (iii) Importance (three items) and (iv) Responsibility (two items). The five-factor solution could not be confirmed. Further research is recommended to develop a valid and reliable tool to assess nurses' attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention working across different settings on an international level.
© 2014 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2014 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitude; Pressure ulcer prevention; Psychometric validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25124833      PMCID: PMC7950033          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  20 in total

1.  Pressure ulcers: development and psychometric evaluation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP).

Authors:  D Beeckman; T Defloor; L Demarré; A Van Hecke; K Vanderwee
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  Nursing-sensitive benchmarks for hospitals to gauge high-reliability performance.

Authors:  Diane Storer Brown; Nancy Donaldson; Linda Burnes Bolton; Carolyn E Aydin
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.095

3.  The first national pressure ulcer prevalence survey in county council and municipality settings in Sweden.

Authors:  Lena Gunningberg; Ami Hommel; Carina Bååth; Ewa Idvall
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Knowledge, attitudes and barriers towards prevention of pressure ulcers in intensive care units: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tillan Strand; Margareta Lindgren
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 3.072

5.  Factors of importance to the development of pressure ulcers in the care trajectory: perceptions of hospital and community care nurses.

Authors:  Elsy Athlin; Ewa Idvall; Margareth Jernfält; Inger Johansson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Pressure ulcers: knowledge and attitude of nurses and nursing assistants in Belgian nursing homes.

Authors:  Liesbet Demarré; Katrien Vanderwee; Tom Defloor; Sofie Verhaeghe; Lisette Schoonhoven; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Knowledge, beliefs and use of nursing methods in preventing pressure sores in Dutch hospitals.

Authors:  R J Halfens; M Eggink
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis.

Authors:  D L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Explaining the national differences in pressure ulcer prevalence between the Netherlands and Germany--adjusted for personal risk factors and institutional quality indicators.

Authors:  Antje Tannen; Ekkehart Dietz; Theo Dassen; Ruud Halfens
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 10.  What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Richard Grol; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  The development and testing of the C/WoundComp instrument for assessing chronic wound-care competence in student nurses and podiatrists.

Authors:  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa; Riitta Suhonen; Maarit Ahtiala; Terhi Kolari; Jouko Katajisto; Leena Salminen; Minna Stolt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument.

Authors:  María Dolores López-Franco; Laura Parra-Anguita; Inés María Comino-Sanz; Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses in intensive care unit on preventing medical device-related pressure injury: A cross-sectional study in western China.

Authors:  Ya-Bin Zhang; Li He; Ling Gou; Ju-Hong Pei; Rui-Ling Nan; Hai-Xia Chen; Xing-Lei Wang; Ye-Hui Du; Hui Yan; Xin-Man Dou
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.