Literature DB >> 23034985

Adolescent perspectives on phase I cancer research.

Victoria A Miller1, Justin N Baker, Angela C Leek, Sabahat Hizlan, Susan R Rheingold, Amy D Yamokoski, Dennis Drotar, Eric Kodish.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine adolescent patients' perspectives on their understanding and decision making about a pediatric phase I cancer study. PROCEDURE: Participants included adolescents ages 14-21 years with cancer (N = 20), all of whom attended a phase I study consent conference. Participants responded to closed- and open-ended questions on a verbally administered structured interview, which assessed aspects of understanding and decision making about the phase I study.
RESULTS: All participants decided to enroll in the phase I study. The majority of participants understood that participation was voluntary, entailed risks, and that they could withdraw. Most also believed that participation in the phase I study would increase the length of their lives. The most frequent reasons for enrolling were positive clinical benefit, needing an option, impact on quality of life, and few side effects or fewer than those of current or past treatments. Eighty-five percent of participants reported that they themselves made the final decision about enrollment in the phase I study.
CONCLUSIONS: Most participants hoped or expected that the phase I study would provide a direct benefit (increased survival time or cure) and reported that they themselves were the final decision-maker about enrollment. Clinicians may underestimate the role of adolescents, especially if they believe that parents typically make such decisions. Future research should assess the actual participation of children and adolescents during the informed consent process and explore the role of hope in their decision making about phase I studies.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23034985      PMCID: PMC3538102          DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  26 in total

1.  Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding.

Authors:  M Miller
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Parents' preferences for participation in decisions made regarding their child's anaesthetic care.

Authors:  A R Tait; T Voepel-Lewis; H M Munro; S Malviya
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  Dying children and medical research: access to clinical trials as benefit and burden.

Authors:  Michelle Oberman; Joel Frader
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2003

4.  Pediatric ethics and early-phase childhood cancer research: conflicted goals and the prospect of benefit.

Authors:  Eric Kodish
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Liana D Castel; Yun Li; Daniel P Sulmasy; Andrew M Balshem; Al B Benson; Caroline B Burnett; Darrell J Gaskin; John L Marshall; Elyse F Slater; Kevin A Schulman; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Communicating and understanding the purpose of pediatric phase I cancer trials.

Authors:  Melissa K Cousino; Stephen J Zyzanski; Amy D Yamokoski; Rebecca A Hazen; Justin N Baker; Robert B Noll; Susan R Rheingold; J Russell Geyer; Stewart C Alexander; Dennis Drotar; Eric D Kodish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Assessment of Preferences for self-treatment and information in health care.

Authors:  D S Krantz; A Baum; M v Wideman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1980-11

8.  Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies: reexamining the arguments and data.

Authors:  Manish Agrawal; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites in National Cancer Institute cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  H A Tejeda; S B Green; E L Trimble; L Ford; J L High; R S Ungerleider; M A Friedman; O W Brawley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-06-19       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The influence of relationships on children's and adolescents' participation in research.

Authors:  Marion E Broome; Deborah J Richards
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  26 in total

1.  Practical communication guidance to improve phase 1 informed consent conversations and decision-making in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Angela C Leek; Dennis Drotar; Robert B Noll; Susan R Rheingold; Eric D Kodish; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Ethics consultation in pediatrics: long-term experience from a pediatric oncology center.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Christopher L Church; Monika Metzger; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Assent Described: Exploring Perspectives From the Inside.

Authors:  Rebecca D Poston
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 2.145

4.  Waivers and Alterations to Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Respecting the Principle of Respect for Persons.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

5.  Why do children decide not to participate in clinical research: a quantitative and qualitative study.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Martine C de Vries; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Johannes B van Goudoever; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Contrasting views of risk perception and influence of financial compensation between adolescent research participants and their parents.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Adrienne Viola; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

8.  Patient involvement in informed consent for pediatric phase I cancer research.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Justin N Baker; Angela C Leek; Dennis Drotar; Eric Kodish
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.289

9.  Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Molly McFatrich; Jennifer W Mack; Scott H Maurer; Shana S Jacobs; David R Freyer; Janice S Withycombe; Justin N Baker; Sharon M Castellino; Li Lin; Nicole R Lucas; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Parental Experiences of Child Participation in a Phase I Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial: "We Don't Have Time to Waste".

Authors:  Stacey Crane; Joan E Haase; Susan E Hickman
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2018-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.