Literature DB >> 23034352

Insect wet steps: loss of fluid from insect feet adhering to a substrate.

Alexander E Kovalev1, Alexander E Filippov, Stanislav N Gorb.   

Abstract

Reliable attachment ability of insect adhesive pads is proposed to be due to pad secretion. It has been shown that surface roughness strongly reduces adhesion forces of insect pads. This effect has been explained by decreased contact area and rapid fluid absorption from the pad surface by rough surfaces. However, it remains unclear how the fluid flows on rough substrates having different roughness parameters and surface energy. In this paper, we numerically studied the fluid flow on rough substrates during contact formation. The results demonstrate that an increase in the density of the substrate structures leads to an increase in fluid loss from the pad: substrates with a fine roughness absorb pad fluid faster. Decreased affinity of the solid substrate to the fluid has a more remarkable effect on the fluid loss and leads to a decrease in the fluid loss. With an increase in the aspect ratio of the substrate irregularities (porosity), the fluid loss is decreased. The numerical results obtained agree well with previous observations on insects and experimental results on nanoporous substrata. The significance of the obtained results for understanding biological wet adhesives is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23034352      PMCID: PMC3565793          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  24 in total

1.  Evolution of locomotory attachment pads of hexapods.

Authors:  S N Gorb; R G Beutel
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2001-12

2.  Slippery pores: anti-adhesive effect of nanoporous substrates on the beetle attachment system.

Authors:  E V Gorb; N Hosoda; C Miksch; S N Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly's seta.

Authors:  Mattias G Langer; J Peter Ruppersberg; Stanislav Gorb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Influence of surface roughness on adhesion between elastic bodies.

Authors:  A G Peressadko; N Hosoda; B N J Persson
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment.

Authors:  E Gorb; K Haas; A Henrich; S Enders; N Barbakadze; S Gorb
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance.

Authors:  James M R Bullock; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping.

Authors:  Jan-Henning Dirks; Christofer J Clemente; Walter Federle
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Shear induced adhesion: contact mechanics of biological spatula-like attachment devices.

Authors:  Alexander Filippov; Valentin L Popov; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Insect aquaplaning: Nepenthes pitcher plants capture prey with the peristome, a fully wettable water-lubricated anisotropic surface.

Authors:  Holger F Bohn; Walter Federle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence.

Authors:  James M R Bullock; Patrick Drechsler; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hierarchical architecture of spider attachment setae reconstructed from scanning nanofocus X-ray diffraction data.

Authors:  Clemens F Schaber; Silja Flenner; Anja Glisovic; Igor Krasnov; Martin Rosenthal; Hergen Stieglitz; Christina Krywka; Manfred Burghammer; Martin Müller; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  When the going gets rough - studying the effect of surface roughness on the adhesive abilities of tree frogs.

Authors:  Niall Crawford; Thomas Endlein; Jonathan T Pham; Mathis Riehle; W Jon P Barnes
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Use of biomimetic hexagonal surface texture in friction against lubricated skin.

Authors:  Alexey Tsipenyuk; Michael Varenberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Surface roughness rather than surface chemistry essentially affects insect adhesion.

Authors:  Matt W England; Tomoya Sato; Makoto Yagihashi; Atsushi Hozumi; Stanislav N Gorb; Elena V Gorb
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.649

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.