Literature DB >> 19483006

Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance.

James M R Bullock1, Walter Federle.   

Abstract

Many beetles employ arrays of adhesive setae to control attachment during locomotion. Here we investigate whether and how variation in seta structure, both between sexes and between tarsal pads on the same leg, determines the mechanical properties and adhesive performance of fibrillar arrays. We vertically compressed individual adhesive pads to determine their effective elastic modulus. Distal adhesive arrays were significantly softer than middle and proximal ones. Variation in stiffness was mainly due to different seta diameters, but calculated elastic moduli of seta cuticle were relatively constant at 5-16 GPa. Consistent with their greater compliance, distal pads generated higher adhesion and friction on rough substrates. However, the greater stiffness of proximal pads conveys a superior ability to push. Proximal pads of males were less direction dependent than distal pads and generated larger pushing forces in the distal and lateral directions. In females, proximal pads also produced higher friction forces than distal pads, but only in the lateral direction. Video recordings of vertically climbing beetles confirmed that each pad was used differently. When legs above the body centre of gravity were pulling, beetles mainly engaged the distal pads, whereas legs below the centre of gravity mainly pushed with the proximal pads. Attachment performance was additionally compared between sexes on different substrates. Our findings demonstrate the presence of sex-specific specialisations of the fibrillar system as well as a division of labour between different adhesive pads on the same tarsus.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19483006     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.030551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  31 in total

1.  Slippery pores: anti-adhesive effect of nanoporous substrates on the beetle attachment system.

Authors:  E V Gorb; N Hosoda; C Miksch; S N Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Two functional types of attachment pads on a single foot in the Namibia bush cricket Acanthoproctus diadematus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Constanze Grohmann; Miriam Judith Henze; Thomas Nørgaard; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The insect-trapping rim of Nepenthes pitchers: surface structure and function.

Authors:  Ulrike Bauer; Walter Federle
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-11-25

4.  Friction ridges in cockroach climbing pads: anisotropy of shear stress measured on transparent, microstructured substrates.

Authors:  Christofer J Clemente; Jan-Henning Dirks; David R Barbero; Ullrich Steiner; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae.

Authors:  James M R Bullock; Walter Federle
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-04-05

6.  Locomotion and attachment of leaf beetle larvae Gastrophysa viridula (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae).

Authors:  Daniel B Zurek; Stanislav N Gorb; Dagmar Voigt
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Porous substrate affects a subsequent attachment ability of the beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae).

Authors:  Elena V Gorb; Wiebke Lemke; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Soiled adhesive pads shear clean by slipping: a robust self-cleaning mechanism in climbing beetles.

Authors:  Guillermo J Amador; Thomas Endlein; Metin Sitti
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Insect wet steps: loss of fluid from insect feet adhering to a substrate.

Authors:  Alexander E Kovalev; Alexander E Filippov; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Ground reaction forces in vertically ascending beetles and corresponding activity of the claw retractor muscle on smooth and rough substrates.

Authors:  Philipp Bußhardt; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.