Literature DB >> 11824227

Evolution of locomotory attachment pads of hexapods.

S N Gorb1, R G Beutel.   

Abstract

This study shows that, in their evolution, hexapods have convergently developed two distinctly different mechanisms to attach themselves to a variety of substrates during locomotion. The first mechanism is provided by hairy surfaces and the second one by smooth flexible pads. The main similarity of both mechanisms is that the structured pad surface or particular properties of pad materials guarantee a maximum real contact with diverse substrata, regardless of their microsculpture. Ten characters of the two alternative designs were coded and analyzed together with a data matrix containing 105 additional morphological characters of different stages and body parts. The analysis demonstrates that similar structures (arolium, euplantulae, hairy tarsomeres) have evolved independently in several hexapod lineages. The evolution of flight and the associated necessity of being able to cling to vegetation or other substrates are suggested to be major triggers for the evolution of attachment structures.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11824227     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-001-0274-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  24 in total

1.  Characterization of the structure and composition of gecko adhesive setae.

Authors:  N W Rizzo; K H Gardner; D J Walls; N M Keiper-Hrynko; T S Ganzke; D L Hallahan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Friction and adhesion in the tarsal and metatarsal scopulae of spiders.

Authors:  Senta Niederegger; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure.

Authors:  S Gorb; M Varenberg; A Peressadko; J Tuma
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Biologically inspired crack trapping for enhanced adhesion.

Authors:  Nicholas J Glassmaker; Anand Jagota; Chung-Yuen Hui; William L Noderer; Manoj K Chaudhury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Versatility of Turing patterns potentiates rapid evolution in tarsal attachment microstructures of stick and leaf insects (Phasmatodea).

Authors:  Thies H Büscher; Mikhail Kryuchkov; Vladimir L Katanaev; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Insect wet steps: loss of fluid from insect feet adhering to a substrate.

Authors:  Alexander E Kovalev; Alexander E Filippov; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Contact between rough surfaces and a criterion for macroscopic adhesion.

Authors:  Lars Pastewka; Mark O Robbins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Material structure, stiffness, and adhesion: why attachment pads of the grasshopper (Tettigonia viridissima) adhere more strongly than those of the locust (Locusta migratoria) (Insecta: Orthoptera).

Authors:  Pablo Perez Goodwyn; Andrei Peressadko; Heinz Schwarz; Victoria Kastner; Stanislav Gorb
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Sticking like sticky tape: tree frogs use friction forces to enhance attachment on overhanging surfaces.

Authors:  Thomas Endlein; Aihong Ji; Diana Samuel; Ning Yao; Zhongyuan Wang; W Jon P Barnes; Walter Federle; Michael Kappl; Zhendong Dai
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Learning from Northern clingfish (Gobiesox maeandricus): bioinspired suction cups attach to rough surfaces.

Authors:  Petra Ditsche; Adam Summers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.