OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate, by PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR, the yield and quality of genomic DNA collected from buccal cells by mouthwash after different storage times at room temperature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of volunteers was recruited to collect buccal cells using a mouthwash solution. The collected solution was divided into 3 tubes, one tube were used for immediate extraction and the remaining received ethanol and were kept at room temperature for 4 and 8 days followed by dna extraction. The concentration, purity and integrity of the dna were determined using spectrophotometry and electrophoresis. DNA quality differences among the three incubation times were also evaluated for genotyping EGF +61 a/g (rs 4444903) polymorphism by PCR-RFLP and for IRF6 polymorphism (rs 17015215) using real-time PCR. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of dna yield (p=0.75) and purity (p=0.86) among the three different incubation times. DNA obtained from different incubation times presented high-molecular weight. The PCR-RFLP and real time pcr reactions were successfully performed for all DNA samples, even those extracted after 8 days of incubation. All samples genotyped by real-time pcr presented c allele for irf6 gene polymorphism (homozygous: cc; heterozygous: Ct) and the C allele was used as a reference for Ct values. The samples presented the same genotype for the different times in both techniques. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the method described herein is simple and low cost, and that DNA can be extracted and pcr amplified after storage in mouthwash solution at room temperature.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate, by PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR, the yield and quality of genomic DNA collected from buccal cells by mouthwash after different storage times at room temperature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of volunteers was recruited to collect buccal cells using a mouthwash solution. The collected solution was divided into 3 tubes, one tube were used for immediate extraction and the remaining received ethanol and were kept at room temperature for 4 and 8 days followed by dna extraction. The concentration, purity and integrity of the dna were determined using spectrophotometry and electrophoresis. DNA quality differences among the three incubation times were also evaluated for genotyping EGF+61 a/g (rs 4444903) polymorphism by PCR-RFLP and for IRF6 polymorphism (rs 17015215) using real-time PCR. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of dna yield (p=0.75) and purity (p=0.86) among the three different incubation times. DNA obtained from different incubation times presented high-molecular weight. The PCR-RFLP and real time pcr reactions were successfully performed for all DNA samples, even those extracted after 8 days of incubation. All samples genotyped by real-time pcr presented c allele for irf6 gene polymorphism (homozygous: cc; heterozygous: Ct) and the C allele was used as a reference for Ct values. The samples presented the same genotype for the different times in both techniques. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the method described herein is simple and low cost, and that DNA can be extracted and pcr amplified after storage in mouthwash solution at room temperature.
Authors: K Ranade; M S Chang; C T Ting; D Pei; C F Hsiao; M Olivier; R Pesich; J Hebert; Y D Chen; V J Dzau; D Curb; R Olshen; N Risch; D R Cox; D Botstein Journal: Genome Res Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Carlos Ferreira Dos Santos; Vivien Thiemy Sakai; Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado; Daniela Nicole Schippers; Andrew Seth Greene Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Majid Shahbazi; Vera Pravica; Najma Nasreen; Hana Fakhoury; Anthony A Fryer; Richard C Strange; Peter E Hutchinson; Joy E Osborne; John T Lear; Andrew G Smith; Ian V Hutchinson Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-02-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L Le Marchand; A Lum-Jones; B Saltzman; V Visaya; A M Nomura; L N Kolonel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Irena B King; Jessie Satia-Abouta; Mark D Thornquist; Jeannette Bigler; Ruth E Patterson; Alan R Kristal; Ann L Shattuck; John D Potter; Emily White; Jessie Satia Abouta Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: T Juárez-Cedillo; S Sánchez-García; J F Mould-Quevedo; C García-Peña; J J Gallo; F A Wagner; G Vargas-Alarcón Journal: Genet Mol Res Date: 2010-09-21
Authors: Kun-Ming Chen; Yuan-Wan Sun; Nicolle M Krebs; Dongxiao Sun; Jacek Krzeminski; Lisa Reinhart; Krishne Gowda; Shantu Amin; Susan Mallery; John P Richie; Karam El-Bayoumy Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 4.741
Authors: Priscila L Casado; Diego P Aguiar; Lucas C Costa; Marcos A Fonseca; Thays C S Vieira; Claudia C K Alvim-Pereira; Fabiano Alvim-Pereira; Kathleen Deeley; José M Granjeiro; Paula C Trevilatto; Alexandre R Vieira Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Ida Anjomshoaa; Jessica Briseño-Ruiz; Kathleen Deeley; Fernardo A Poletta; Juan C Mereb; Aline L Leite; Priscila A T M Barreta; Thelma L Silva; Piper Dizak; Timothy Ruff; Asli Patir; Mine Koruyucu; Zerrin Abbasoğlu; Priscila L Casado; Andrew Brown; Samer H Zaky; Merve Bayram; Erika C Küchler; Margaret E Cooper; Kai Liu; Mary L Marazita; İlknur Tanboğa; José M Granjeiro; Figen Seymen; Eduardo E Castilla; Iêda M Orioli; Charles Sfeir; Hongjiao Owyang; Marília A R Buzalaf; Alexandre R Vieira Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240