| Literature DB >> 23031408 |
Barna Babik, Zsófia Csorba, Dorottya Czövek, Patrick N Mayr, Gábor Bogáts, Ferenc Peták.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The slope of phase III of the capnogram (SIII) relates to progressive emptying of the alveoli, a ventilation/perfusion mismatch, and ventilation inhomogeneity. S(III) depends not only on the airway geometry, but also on the dynamic respiratory compliance (Crs); this latter effect has not been evaluated. Accordingly, we established the value of SIII for monitoring airway resistance during mechanical ventilation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23031408 PMCID: PMC3682277 DOI: 10.1186/cc11659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Number of patients with different conditions/diagnoses in each protocol group.
| Gender* (m/f) | Obesity* (n/ow/ob) | Pulmonary status E*/A*/CB*/OLD | Cardiac disease CAD/AS/MI/LEF*/OCD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20/9 | 10/19/- | -/-/-/- | 26/3/3/-/1 | |
| 15/- | 8/7/- | 14/-/6/- | 11/4/-/-/- | |
| 56/28 | 12/28/44 | 37/10/15/2 | 61/28/8/10/3 | |
| 3/12 | -/5/10 | 4/4/4/- | 10/3/1/8/1 | |
Obesity categories: n, normal (20 ≤ BMI < 25); ow, overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30); ob, obese (30 ≤ BMI). Pulmonary status: E, emphysema; A, asthma; CB, chronic bronchitis; OLD, other lung disease. Cardiac disease: CAD, coronary artery disease; AS, aortic stenosis; MI, mitral insufficiency; LEF, low ejection fraction (EF < 50%); OCD, other cardiac disease. Pulmonary and cardiac conditions are based on previous clinical diagnoses. *, P < 0.05 between the expected and the observed frequencies in the protocol groups for each variable. Group HC, group of patients with high dynamic respiratory compliance; Group HL, group of patients with healthy lungs; Group LC, group of patients with low dynamic respiratory compliance; Group MC, group of patients with medium dynamic respiratory compliance.
Figure 1Timeline of the experimental protocol. Rrs and Crs, readings from the respirator display; CO2, recording of capnogram curves; Zrs, forced oscillatory measurement of respiratory system impedance. CO2, carbon dioxide; Crs, dynamic respiratory compliance; Rrs, total respiratory resistance; Zrs, input impedance of the respiratory system.
Figure 2Forced oscillatory airway (Raw, airway resistance) and respiratory tissue (G, damping and H, elastance) mechanical parameters, the slope of the third phase of the capnogram as expressed in the time domain before (S. *, P < 0.05 vs. the variable at the previous PEEP level; #, P < 0.05 vs. a variable at a PEEP of 3 cmH2O. α, P < 0.05 vs. Group HL within a PEEP; β, P < 0.05 vs. Group HC within a PEEP; γ, P < 0.05 vs. Group MC within a PEEP.
Figure 3Relationship between forced oscillatory airway resistance (Raw) and phase III slope of time capnogram (S. Thin grey lines denote individual patients; thick black lines with symbols show group mean and SE values.
Figure 4Effects of body mass index (BMI) and ejection fraction (EF) on dynamic respiratory compliance (Crs). The best fit plane is demonstrated with a mesh surface.