Literature DB >> 23030695

Validation of companion diagnostic for detection of mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS gene in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of the NCIC CTG CO.17 trial.

Christopher T Harbison1, Christine E Horak, Jean-Marie Ledeine, Pralay Mukhopadhyay, Daniel P Malone, Chris O'Callaghan, Derek J Jonker, Christos S Karapetis, Shirin Khambata-Ford, Nancy Gustafson, Ovidiu C Trifan, Shao-Chun Chang, Paul Ravetto, George A Green Iv.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The therascreen KRAS RGQ polymerase chain reaction kit is being developed as a companion diagnostic to aid clinicians, through detection of KRAS mutations, in the identification of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are more likely to benefit from cetuximab.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether KRAS mutation status, determined by using the therascreen KRAS kit, is a predictive marker of cetuximab efficacy.
DESIGN: Tissue samples were obtained from patients with mCRC treated on the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) CO.17 phase 3 study of cetuximab plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone. Tumor DNA samples were assessed for the presence of KRAS mutations by using the therascreen KRAS kit. Efficacy and safety were assessed to determine whether mutation status was predictive of outcomes. Results.-Evaluable samples were available from 453 patients (79.2%) enrolled in the NCIC CTG CO.17 trial. The KRAS wild-type subset represented 54.1% (245 of 453) of the evaluated population. Median overall survival of patients with KRAS wild-type tumors was 8.6 months among those who received cetuximab plus BSC and 5.0 months among patients who received BSC alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .002). Among patients with KRAS mutant mCRC, no meaningful difference in overall survival was observed between arms (HR, 0.91; P = .55). These results are consistent with a previous report that analyzed patient tumor samples by using bidirectional sequencing.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the utility of the therascreen KRAS kit as a means of selecting patients who may benefit from cetuximab therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23030695     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0367-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  14 in total

1.  Phase I study of the anti-heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor antibody U3-1565 with cetuximab in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takako Eguchi Nakajima; Narikazu Boku; Ayako Doi; Hiroyuki Arai; Takuro Mizukami; Yoshiki Horie; Naoki Izawa; Mami Hirakawa; Takashi Ogura; Takashi Tsuda; Yu Sunakawa
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Big Potential from Small Agents: Nanoparticles for Imaging-Based Companion Diagnostics.

Authors:  Emily B Ehlerding; Piotr Grodzinski; Weibo Cai; Christina H Liu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 3.  Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi-Bin Song; Qi Wang; Wei-Guo Hu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A comparison of four methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed specimens from metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Mototsugu Matsunaga; Toshikado Kaneta; Keisuke Miwa; Wataru Ichikawa; Ken-Ichi Fujita; Fumio Nagashima; Junji Furuse; Masayoshi Kage; Yoshito Akagi; Yasutsuna Sasaki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Performance characteristics of next-generation sequencing in clinical mutation detection of colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Lisa Haley; Li-Hui Tseng; Gang Zheng; Jonathan Dudley; Derek A Anderson; Nilofer S Azad; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Cancer risk and overall survival in mismatch repair proficient hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome and sporadic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pilar Garre; Lorena Martín; Inmaculada Bando; Alicia Tosar; Patricia Llovet; Julián Sanz; Atocha Romero; Miguel de la Hoya; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Trinidad Caldés
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  The State of the Art in Colorectal Cancer Molecular Biomarker Testing.

Authors:  Raju K Pillai; Jean R Lopategui; Deepti Dhall; Maha Guindi; Thomas Slavin; Catherine E Lofton-Day; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.875

8.  Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Abha Sharma; Guili Zhang; Shagufta Aslam; Karen Yu; Melody Chee; John F Palma
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  Clinical validation of a PCR assay for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: retrospective testing of specimens from the EURTAC trial.

Authors:  Susana Benlloch; Maria Luisa Botero; Jordi Beltran-Alamillo; Clara Mayo; Ana Gimenez-Capitán; Itziar de Aguirre; Cristina Queralt; Jose Luis Ramirez; Santiago Ramón y Cajal; Barbara Klughammer; Mariette Schlegel; Walter Bordogna; David Chen; Guili Zhang; Barbara Kovach; Felice Shieh; John F Palma; Lin Wu; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Miquel Taron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Molecular Diagnostics for Precision Medicine in Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Guoli Chen; Zhaohai Yang; James R Eshleman; George J Netto; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.